3R MoS2–MoO3 Composite Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing catalyst materials containing molybdenum disulfide do not achieve the desired performance for hydrogen evolution, despite efforts to enhance catalytic activity through micronization or deagglomeration.

Innovation Solution

A composite of molybdenum disulfide and molybdenum trioxide with specific crystal structures and composition ratios, along with a production method involving calcination at low temperatures, to create a catalyst with improved catalytic performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If molybdenum disulfide is micronized or deagglomerated to enhance catalytic activity, then the catalytic performance is improved to a certain extent, but the expected performance is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic performanceVSAvoidperformance control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite material containing both molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) phases. This composite structure allows the MoS2 to provide catalytic activity while the MoO3 component enhances the overall performance, achieving better catalytic efficiency than pure MoS2 alone. The composite nature enables synergistic effects that resolve the limitation of merely micronizing MoS2.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls the phase composition ratio between MoS2 and MoO3, specifying that the MoO3 content is 10-50 mass% of the total composite. By adjusting this compositional parameter, the catalyst achieves optimal performance. Additionally, the patent controls particle size parameters (D50: 1-10 μm) to balance catalytic activity with stability, resolving the performance control issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If molybdenum disulfide is processed to unique shapes (monolayer, nanoflower, fullerene-like) to improve performance, then catalytic activity is enhanced, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts a homogeneous composite structure where MoS2 and MoO3 phases are uniformly distributed at the micrometer scale (D50: 1-10 μm). This homogeneous approach avoids the manufacturing complexity of creating intricate nanoscale structures like monolayers or nanoflowers, while still achieving enhanced catalytic activity through the phase composite effect. The uniform particle size distribution simplifies processing compared to complex shaped structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

3Reliability

If the proportion of molybdenum trioxide is increased to enhance catalytic performance, then the number of active sites increases, but the cost and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic performanceVSAvoidmaterial content
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by incorporating MoO3 at an optimized concentration range of 10-50 mass% rather than using excessive amounts. This partial incorporation is sufficient to provide the necessary catalytic enhancement through active sites at the MoS2-MoO3 interfaces, while avoiding unnecessary material consumption. The lower bound (10 mass%) ensures adequate performance, and the upper bound (50 mass%) prevents waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite exhibits enhanced catalytic activity as a hydrogen evolution catalyst, with improved catalytic performance due to electron exchange at the interface and optimized proportions of molybdenum disulfide and trioxide, leading to increased active sites and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

heating molybdenum trioxide in the presence of a sulfur source at a temperature of 400°C or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSulfurization reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

improved catalytic performance due to electron exchange at the interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron exchange: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance

Implementation Method 3

average crystallite size of 50 nm or less as determined from a peak at 2θ = 14.4°±0.5° obtained by X-ray diffraction measurement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray diffraction: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentEP4588561A1Composite body, catalytic ink, and method for manufacturing composite body
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 DIC CORP
  • EP4588561A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4588561A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4588561A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided is a composite including molybdenum disulfide and molybdenum trioxide, in which the molybdenum disulfide includes a 3R crystal structure, and the percentage content of a molybdenum trioxide-equivalent value (B) calculated from the molybdenum content determined by XRF analysis of the composite relative to the total mass of the composite is 5 to 90 mass%. Also provided is a catalytic ink including the composite and a solvent. Also provided is a method for producing the composite, including a calcination step of heating molybdenum trioxide in the presence of a sulfur source at a temperature of 400°C or less.