Segmented MOSFET Gate Structure for RF Switch Coff*Ron Trade-Off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MOSFET transistors used in RF signal switching applications face challenges in optimizing the trade-off between parasitic capacitance and on-state resistance, which affects their performance and efficiency, particularly in maintaining high voltage handling capabilities without increasing the complexity and cost of manufacturing processes.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a gate region with a unique structure, featuring a first portion and a second portion with varying lengths and thicknesses of the gate insulator, along with a lightly-doped drain region and an oxide layer, to minimize overlap capacitance and on-state resistance, achieved through specific etching steps and material deposition techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the gate region is made longer to reduce on-state resistance, then the on-state resistance decreases, but the parasitic capacitance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveon-state resistanceVSAvoidparasitic capacitance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gate region is divided into two distinct portions: a first portion extending over the channel region and a second portion positioned adjacent to the first portion but not overlapping the channel. This segmentation allows each portion to serve different functions - the first portion controls the channel while the second portion provides capacitance reduction, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining low on-state resistance and minimizing parasitic capacitance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the gate structure are given different properties - the first portion of the gate region is positioned to provide effective channel control for low on-state resistance, while the second portion is strategically positioned to minimize overlap with the channel region, thereby reducing parasitic capacitance. This local differentiation allows simultaneous optimization of both parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the gate insulator thickness is increased to reduce parasitic capacitance, then the parasitic capacitance decreases, but the voltage handling capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic capacitanceVSAvoidvoltage handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The gate insulator structure is made non-uniform with different thicknesses in different regions. The first region has a first thickness optimized for voltage handling, while the second region has a second thickness optimized for capacitance reduction. This local differentiation allows the structure to simultaneously achieve both low parasitic capacitance and high voltage handling capability without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of uniformly increasing gate insulator thickness throughout, the invention varies the thickness in the lateral dimension across different regions. This dimensional approach allows optimization of electrical properties in different spatial locations, achieving both low capacitance and high voltage tolerance by positioning thinner and thicker regions appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the gate region is made shorter to reduce parasitic capacitance, then the parasitic capacitance decreases, but the on-state resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic capacitanceVSAvoidon-state resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the gate region into two portions with different functions, the invention overcomes the limitation of a single uniform gate length. The first portion maintains adequate overlap with the channel for low on-state resistance, while the second portion extends adjacent to the first portion to provide additional capacitance reduction without proportionally increasing resistance, thus resolving the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces parasitic capacitance and on-state resistance, enhancing the performance of MOSFET transistors for RF signal switching while maintaining high voltage handling capabilities without adding complex manufacturing steps, thus improving the trade-off between Coff*Ron and voltage RF Vmax.

Implementation Method 1

comprises, for example, consists of, a layer of reoxidation of the gate region, for example of thermal reoxidation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal reoxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS20240063280A1Mosfet transistor
Publication Date: 2024.02.22 STMICROELECTRONICS (ROUSSET) SAS
  • US20240063280A1 patent drawing
  • US20240063280A1 patent drawing
  • US20240063280A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A MOSFET transistor includes, on a semiconductor layer, a stack of a gate insulator and of a gate region on the gate insulator. The gate region has a first gate portion and a second gate portion between the first gate portion and the gate insulator. The first gate portion has a first length in a first lateral direction of the transistor. The second gate portion has a second length in the first lateral direction that is shorter than the first length.