Motion Adaptive De-interlacing for Video Artifact Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing de-interlacing techniques, such as bob and weave de-interlacing, often result in image quality issues like softening or jagged edges due to their inability to accurately detect motion between interlaced fields, leading to artifacts like 'mouse teeth' and reduced vertical resolution.

Innovation Solution

A motion adaptive de-interlacing system that combines bob and weave techniques based on accurate motion detection between interlaced fields, using a motion detector and image feature analyzer to generate control signals for a combiner to produce high-quality progressive frames.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If bob de-interlacing is used, then temporal resolution is improved, but vertical resolution is reduced and image softening occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal resolutionVSAvoidvertical resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different de-interlacing methods to different regions of the image based on motion detection. Static regions use weave de-interlacing to preserve vertical resolution, while motion regions use bob de-interlacing to maintain temporal resolution. This local adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing each region to use the most appropriate method for its characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically switches between bob and weave de-interlacing methods based on real-time motion detection. The system continuously analyzes motion vectors and adjusts the de-interlacing approach frame by frame and region by region, making the processing adaptive rather than static. This dynamic approach allows optimal resolution preservation under varying motion conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If weave de-interlacing is used, then vertical resolution is preserved, but motion artifacts like mouse teeth appear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical resolutionVSAvoidmotion artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies motion regions through motion detection algorithms and applies bob de-interlacing specifically to those regions, while using weave de-interlacing for static regions. This prevents mouse teeth artifacts in motion areas while preserving vertical resolution in static areas, resolving the contradiction through spatially selective processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically determines the appropriate de-interlacing method for each region based on motion characteristics. By continuously detecting motion vectors and adjusting the de-interlacing strategy in real-time, the system prevents artifacts in motion regions while maintaining resolution in static regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If motion detection is improved for accurate de-interlacing, then image quality is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image into multiple regions based on motion detection results and applies different de-interlacing methods to each segment. This segmentation approach allows complex motion-adaptive processing only where necessary, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining image quality in critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts processing parameters such as motion detection sensitivity and de-interlacing method selection based on scene characteristics. By dynamically changing processing parameters rather than using fixed complex algorithms, the system achieves high image quality with adaptive complexity management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10440318B2Motion adaptive de-interlacing and advanced film mode detection
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 SYNAPTICS INC
  • US10440318B2 patent drawing
  • US10440318B2 patent drawing
  • US10440318B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including a motion adaptive de-interlacer, a film mode detector, and a combiner. The motion adaptive de-interlacer is configured to determine a first output by de-interlacing a plurality of interlaced frames based on at least a first motion indicator indicating motion between fields of the plurality of interlaced frames. The film mode detector is configured to determine a second output based on a film mode detected based on at least a second motion indicator indicating motion between fields of the plurality of interlaced frames. The film mode detector is further configured to output a control signal based on the second motion indicator and the film mode. The combiner is configured to combine the first output and the second output based on the control signal.