Full-Frame Media Stabilization With Motion-Adaptive Frame Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video stabilization methods in electronic devices suffer from suboptimal performance due to the use of fixed hyperparameters and camera motion agnostic parameters, leading to poorer stabilization, excessive crop, and loss of field of view, resulting in an unpleasant viewing experience.

Innovation Solution

A method for full frame media stabilization that dynamically selects stabilization procedures and frame fusion based on the type and variation of motion, using ego motion classification and adaptive path smoothing to preserve the field of view.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing video stabilization methods use fixed hyperparameters and camera motion agnostic parameters, then the stabilization process is simple, but the stabilization quality is poor and excessive crop occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization qualityVSAvoidstabilization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection of stabilization procedures and frame fusion methods based on detected motion types and their variations. The system adapts the stabilization approach in real-time rather than using fixed parameters, allowing optimal stabilization quality for different motion scenarios while maintaining manageable complexity through automated adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters dynamically by selecting different stabilization procedures and frame fusion methods based on motion characteristics. Instead of using fixed hyperparameters, the system adjusts the stabilization approach according to the detected motion type and its variation, improving stabilization quality without requiring manual parameter tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If constant field of view restriction is applied for video stabilization, then the stabilization is easier to implement, but important details are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization performanceVSAvoidfield of view loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic field of view restriction based on motion types and their variations. Instead of using constant restriction, the system adapts the degree of crop dynamically, applying minimal restriction for static scenes and more aggressive stabilization for dynamic scenarios. This preserves important details while maintaining stabilization performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If motion compensation is applied to accommodate difference between original and smooth path, then camera motion is stabilized, but blank regions are created requiring crop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera motion stabilityVSAvoidfield of view area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the crop parameters dynamically based on motion characteristics. By analyzing motion types and their variations, the system adjusts the crop region to minimize blank regions while preserving the maximum possible field of view. This reduces the area loss compared to fixed crop approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple smooth camera paths are available for a given input camera path, then more stabilization options exist, but choosing the optimal path becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization optionsVSAvoidpath selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically selecting the optimal stabilization path and procedure based on detected motion characteristics. The motion analysis module and procedure selection module work together to autonomously choose the best approach without requiring manual intervention, making the complexity transparent to the user while providing multiple stabilization options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12464239B2Full frame media stabilization in electronic devices
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12464239B2 patent drawing
  • US12464239B2 patent drawing
  • US12464239B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may comprise detecting at least one motion of the electronic device while capturing a plurality of media frames, determining a type of the at least one motion of the electronic device while capturing the plurality of media frames, determining a variation in the type of the at least one motion of the electronic device over a pre-determined period of time, selecting at least one stabilization procedure from a plurality of stabilization procedures and a frame fusion procedure from a plurality of frame fusion procedures based on the type of the at least one motion of the electronic device and the variation in the type of the at least one motion of the electronic device, and stabilizing, after the capturing of the plurality of media frames, the plurality of media frames based on the at least one selected stabilization procedure and the selected frame fusion procedure.