Motion Bar and Wireless UI for Safer Robot Teaching
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional teaching pendants in industrial robot systems are bulky and heavy due to safety requirements, making them difficult to use with existing UI devices like phones and tablets, and limiting design flexibility.
Innovation Solution
A motion bar with functional buttons and a wireless user interface (WLUI) that separates motion-related control functions from other control functions, allowing for flexible design while maintaining safety compliance, with the motion bar connected via cable and WLUI connected wirelessly, enabling operation mode switching and direct joint manipulation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If teaching pendants include emergency-stop button, enabling button, and wired cable connection to comply with safety requirements, then safety is improved, but the device becomes bulky and heavy
Solution Approach 1:
The patent divides the teaching pendant into two separate controllers: a first controller that provides motion-related control functions (including emergency stop and enabling buttons) and a second controller that provides non-motion control functions (such as programming). This segmentation allows the motion control functions to be isolated in a dedicated device that can be made compact and safe, while the second controller can be a separate programming device that does not need to meet the same safety requirements for direct motion control.
2Reliability
If teaching pendants include extra layers of protection to fulfill safety requirements, then safety is improved, but the design becomes bulky and heavy
Solution Approach 1:
The patent divides the teaching pendant into two separate controllers: a first controller that provides motion-related control functions (including emergency stop and enabling buttons) and a second controller that provides non-motion control functions (such as programming). This segmentation allows the motion control functions to be isolated in a dedicated device that can be made compact and safe, while the second controller can be a separate programming device that does not need to meet the same safety requirements for direct motion control.
3Ease of operation
If teaching pendants are designed to be compact and flexible, then ease of operation is improved, but compliance with safety requirements becomes difficult
Solution Approach 1:
The patent divides the teaching pendant into two separate controllers: a first controller that provides motion-related control functions (including emergency stop and enabling buttons) and a second controller that provides non-motion control functions (such as programming). This segmentation allows the motion control functions to be isolated in a dedicated device that can be made compact and safe, while the second controller can be a separate programming device that does not need to meet the same safety requirements for direct motion control.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a control box as an intermediary device that receives input from both the first controller (motion control) and the second controller (programming). The control box processes these inputs and generates appropriate control commands for the robot. This intermediary architecture allows the system to maintain safety compliance through the first controller while enabling flexible programming through the second controller.
Data Source
AI summary
A teaching system for a robot is provided, including a motion bar for controlling the robot and a robot system utilizing the teaching system. In one embodiment, the teaching system is provided including a first controller configured to provide motion-related control functions for controlling motion of the robot. The teaching system may also include a second controller configured to provide control functions other than the motion-related control functions for programming one or more actions of the robot.


