Motion Data Training Assessment Using Intensity and Volume

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current training assessment methods rely solely on training amount, such as time and distance, providing unilateral assessment information that fails to accurately reflect a user's training status, leading to poor accuracy and effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A training assessment method that determines an achievement rate and a completion rate based on motion data during a preset training plan, characterizing training intensity and volume, respectively, to provide a comprehensive assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If training assessment is based only on training amount (time and distance), then the assessment method is simple, but the assessment accuracy and effectiveness deteriorate due to unilateral assessment information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment method complexityVSAvoidtraining status assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training assessment into two distinct dimensions: achievement rate (training intensity) and completion rate (training volume). This segmentation allows comprehensive assessment while maintaining clear calculation methods for each dimension, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional assessment (training amount only) to two-dimensional assessment by introducing the achievement rate dimension based on motion data. This dimensional expansion enables more accurate training status evaluation without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If motion data is collected and processed to determine achievement rate and completion rate, then training status assessment accuracy improves, but the device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining status assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential motion data parameters needed for achievement rate calculation from the complex motion data stream. This extraction approach maintains high assessment accuracy while reducing processing complexity by focusing on critical data points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically processes motion data to calculate both achievement rate and completion rate without requiring manual intervention. This self-service approach handles the increased data processing requirements through automated algorithms, maintaining accuracy while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260021349A1Training assessment method, electronic device, and computer-readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 GUANGDONG COROS SPORTS TECH JOINT CO
  • US20260021349A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021349A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021349A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A training assessment method includes obtaining motion data of a user when executing a preset training plan, and determining an achievement rate and a completion rate corresponding to the user based on the motion data and the preset training plan. The achievement rate corresponding to the user characterizes an achievement situation of the user in terms of training intensity, and the completion rate corresponding to the user characterizes a completion situation of the user in terms of training volume. The method further includes determining an assessment result based on the achievement rate corresponding to the user and the completion rate corresponding to the user.