Motion Detection Using Block Feature Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surveillance camera systems struggle to accurately detect motion in dynamic environments due to sensitivity to natural changes, leading to false alarms and inefficient data handling, as they rely on pixel data processing which is not resilient against variations like flowing water or changing daylight conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method that classifies image blocks as background or foreground using Sobel edge and spatial high frequency response values, assigning strength scores and tracking counts to identify new, persistent, and recurring rectangles, and validates these to produce a final list of genuine motion detection, thereby segregating foreground from background and reducing false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pixel data processing is used to detect motion, then motion detection can be performed, but the system becomes sensitive to natural changes and produces false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image into multiple blocks and processes each block independently, extracting features such as Sobel edge values and spatial high frequency response. This segmentation allows the system to distinguish between local variations caused by natural changes and genuine motion, reducing false alarms while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing techniques to different regions of the image based on their characteristics. By analyzing local block features and comparing them with temporal profiles, the system adapts its detection sensitivity to local conditions, making it resilient to natural variations in specific areas while remaining sensitive to genuine motion elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If pixel data processing is used for motion detection, then detection can be performed, but data handling becomes inefficient and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary features from each image block (Sobel edge values, spatial high frequency response) rather than processing all pixel data. This extraction significantly reduces the quantity of data that needs to be stored and transported while maintaining the information needed for accurate motion detection and background modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary feature extraction and block classification before final motion detection. By pre-processing the image data to identify and separate background blocks from potential foreground objects, the system reduces the computational burden on subsequent processing stages and improves overall detection efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If background modeling is used to segregate foreground and background, then motion detection can be performed, but the system struggles with dynamic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackground separation accuracyVSAvoiddynamic environment resilience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic background modeling that continuously adapts to changing conditions. By maintaining temporal profiles of block features and updating the background model over time, the system can distinguish between static background elements and dynamic foreground objects, even in environments with natural variations such as flowing water or moving vegetation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback from temporal analysis of block features to refine the background model. By comparing current block features with their temporal profiles and using this feedback to update the background representation, the system becomes more resilient to dynamic changes while maintaining accurate foreground segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9390333B2System and method for robust motion detection
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 GEO SEMICONDUCTOR INC
  • US9390333B2 patent drawing
  • US9390333B2 patent drawing
  • US9390333B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and system for detecting objects of interest in a camera monitored area are disclosed. Statistical analysis of block feature data, particularly Sobel edge and spatial high frequency responses is used to model the background of the scene and to segregate foreground objects from the background. This technique provides a robust motion detection scheme prone to catching genuine motions and immune against false alarms.