Motion Detector Masking Detection Using Time-of-Flight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motion detectors face challenges in accurately detecting masking, particularly with materials that absorb infrared light, leading to false detections and difficulties in identifying masking using black objects, especially when they are spaced away from the detector.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an optical time-of-flight sensor as an ancillary sensing system, which uses ultraviolet or infrared light to determine the distance of objects within the monitored environment, reducing false masking detections by focusing on time-of-flight rather than intensity-based methods, and employing a dual-emitter and detector configuration to assess masking and window obscuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If intensity-based masking detection is used, then masking by absorbing materials can be detected, but false detections occur with highly reflective materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasking detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces intensity-based optical detection with time-of-flight measurement. Instead of measuring the intensity of reflected infrared light, the system measures the time it takes for light to travel to and from objects. This substitution of measurement principle eliminates the fundamental problem where reflective materials confuse intensity-based sensors, as time-of-flight measurement is independent of material reflectivity properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameter from optical intensity to time-of-flight. By measuring the temporal characteristic (time) rather than the amplitude characteristic (intensity) of reflected light, the system achieves masking detection capability that is independent of the optical properties (absorptive or reflective) of the masking material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If sensitivity is increased to detect black masking materials, then masking detection improves, but false detections increase with reflective objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasking detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces intensity-based detection with time-of-flight measurement to avoid the sensitivity-reliability trade-off. Time-of-flight sensors naturally provide distance information without being influenced by the optical absorption or reflection properties of materials, thereby achieving high sensitivity for detecting black masking materials without increasing false detections from reflective objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If time-of-flight sensing is used, then false masking detections are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasking detection reliabilityVSAvoidsensing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves masking detection functionality using the same time-of-flight sensor that is already employed for primary motion detection. The ancillary sensing system reuses the emitter and detector components, allowing the system to perform both motion detection and masking detection with a single sensor subsystem, thereby minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The time-of-flight sensor serves dual purposes: detecting motion in the monitored environment and detecting masking of the sensing system. By making the sensor universal for both functions, the patent avoids adding separate dedicated masking detection hardware, thus limiting the complexity increase to primarily software/algorithms processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces false masking detections and improves the ability to identify masking, including black objects at a distance, by utilizing time-of-flight measurements to determine object proximity and window obscuration, enhancing the reliability of motion detection systems.

Implementation Method 1

an ancillary sensing system configured to detect masking of the primary sensing system, the ancillary sensing system comprising an optical time-of-flight sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime-of-flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

receiving a reflection of the optical signal at the motion detector, the reflected optical signal having been reflected by an object within the monitored environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4174814A1Motion detector with masking detection
Publication Date: 2023.05.03 UTC FIRE & SECURITY EMEA BVBA
  • EP4174814A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4174814A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4174814A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A motion detector (1) for a security system comprises a primary sensing system including a PIR sensor (5) configured to detect movement of a person within a monitored environment (2), and an ancillary sensing system including a first emitter (7), a second emitter (8) and a receiver (9) configured to detect masking of the primary sensing system. Masking by an object (10) in the monitored environment (2) is determined using the first emitter (7) and the receiver (9) based on a time-of-flight of an optical signal emitted into the monitored environment (2) and reflected by the object (10). Masking by obscuring of a window (4) of the motion detector (1) is determined using the second emitter (8) and the receiver (9) based on the intensity of light transmission from the second emitter (8) through the window (4) to the receiver (9).