Four-dimensional motion estimation for CT artifact reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing CT image reconstruction methods struggle to efficiently correct motion artifacts, particularly respiratory and cardiac motion, which degrade image quality and complicate diagnosis, especially in low-dose scans.

Innovation Solution

The method employs feature map-based motion estimation using image registration and deep learning networks to generate a four-dimensional motion field, which is then used for motion-compensated reconstruction to produce artifact-free CT images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional CT image reconstruction methods are used, then the reconstruction process is simple and fast, but motion artifacts severely degrade image quality and diagnostic accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidreconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces feature maps as an intermediary representation between projection data and final images. These feature maps capture essential structural information while being more robust to motion artifacts, serving as a mediator that bridges the gap between raw data and high-quality reconstructed images without requiring complex motion correction algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical motion correction approaches (such as multiple X-ray tubes, faster gantry spinning, or heavier equipment) with a computational approach using feature maps and image registration algorithms, substituting physical complexity with intelligent processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If brute force approaches are employed to mitigate motion artifacts (e.g., two X-ray tubes, higher power tubes, faster gantry spinning), then motion correction capability is improved, but hardware costs increase and computational time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion correction capabilityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs motion estimation and feature map registration during the reconstruction process itself, rather than requiring preliminary motion correction scans or post-reconstruction correction. The feature maps are generated and registered in advance of final image formation, enabling efficient motion compensation without extending total scan or processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts motion information from feature maps through image registration, separating the motion estimation task from the full image reconstruction process. This extraction approach allows efficient computation of motion fields without requiring complete reconstruction of all image data, reducing computational time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If brute force approaches are employed to mitigate motion artifacts (e.g., two X-ray tubes, higher power tubes, faster gantry spinning), then motion correction capability is improved, but hardware costs and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion correction capabilityVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical motion correction approaches (such as multiple X-ray tubes, faster gantry spinning, or heavier equipment) with a computational approach using feature maps and image registration algorithms, substituting physical complexity with intelligent processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses computationally efficient feature maps that can be rapidly generated and discarded after extracting motion information, replacing the need for expensive, complex hardware systems. The feature maps serve as temporary, low-cost representations that enable motion correction without requiring permanent investment in complex hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If low-dose CT scanning is performed to reduce radiation exposure, then patient safety is improved, but image quality degrades due to increased noise and motion artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation doseVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of motion artifacts in low-dose scans into useful information by using feature map registration to explicitly estimate and compensate for motion. Rather than treating motion artifacts as mere noise to be filtered, the method extracts motion fields from the artifacts themselves, transforming a problem into a solution that enables effective motion correction at low doses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS20250157100A1Four-dimensional motion estimation and compensation by using feature reconstruction
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 CANON KK
  • US20250157100A1 patent drawing
  • US20250157100A1 patent drawing
  • US20250157100A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical image processing method includes obtaining a set of projection data acquired in a computed tomography (CT) scan of a three-dimensional region of an object to be examined; generating for each time point of a plurality of time points of the CT scan based on a part of the obtained set of projection data corresponding to the time point, a pair of feature maps for estimating motion at the time point so as to generate a plurality of pairs of feature maps, each feature map representing a feature of an image reconstructed from the part of the obtained set of projection data; estimating, based on the generated plurality of pairs of feature maps, a four-dimensional motion field; and reconstructing, based on the estimated four-dimensional motion field and the obtained set of projection data, a CT image of the object.