Motion-Based Input Filter for Patient Care Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical devices are prone to damage and unintended input during transport, posing safety risks to patients due to hazardous motions, accidental activation, and incorrect instructions.

Innovation Solution

A device that filters human interface device inputs based on motion, using a motion event generator and input filter applicator to detect and differentiate between intentional and unintentional inputs, alerting caregivers to potential damage and preventing unintended operations during transport.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If medical devices are transported during patient care, then device versatility and patient care continuity are improved, but device damage risk and unintended input risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice transport capabilityVSAvoiddevice operational integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting motion events and pre-filtering inputs before they can cause damage or unintended operations. Motion sensors continuously monitor for drops, shakes, and bumps, and the filter is pre-configured to block potential harmful inputs based on detected motion patterns, preventing problems before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a motion-based input filter as an intermediary between the motion sensor and the medical device processor. This intermediary component analyzes motion events and selectively blocks or allows inputs based on whether they occur during hazardous motion, thereby protecting the device while allowing normal operation during transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If motion-based input filtering is implemented, then patient safety and device protection are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient safetyVSAvoidinput filtering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the input processing function into distinct components: a motion sensor that detects physical movement, a filter applicator that processes motion events, and an output mechanism that delivers filtered inputs. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall architecture by separating motion detection from input processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The motion-based filter applicator serves multiple functions simultaneously: it protects against device damage from drops and bumps, prevents unintended inputs during transport, and maintains normal device operation during legitimate use. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate protection systems, thereby limiting complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If all inputs are blocked during motion, then device damage prevention is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoiddevice usability during transport
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The input filter dynamically adjusts its blocking behavior based on real-time motion detection. Rather than statically blocking all inputs during transport, the system continuously monitors motion events and selectively filters inputs only when hazardous motion is detected, allowing full operability during normal transport and restricted input only when necessary for protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the input filter based on detected motion characteristics. When motion parameters indicate a drop, shake, or bump event, the filter transitions to a high-blocking state; when motion parameters indicate normal transport or stationary use, the filter transitions to a permissive state, thereby maintaining ease of operation during legitimate use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the risk of damage to medical devices and ensures patient safety by distinguishing between intentional and unintentional inputs, preventing harmful operations and alerting caregivers to potential issues.

Implementation Method 1

A motion sensor, such as an accelerometer, is configured for measuring information associated with a movement of a patient care device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentEP2613698B1Human interface device input filter based on motion
Publication Date: 2020.06.17 CAREFUSION 303 INC
  • EP2613698B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2613698B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2613698B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A device for filtering human interface device inputs based on motion. The device includes a motion event generator configured for generating at least one motion event based on information readings associated with a movement of a patient care device and at least one motion detecting filter, and an input filter applicator, the input filter applicator configured for applying a set of input filters to the at least one motion event, thereby generating a filtered output event that indicates a status of the movement of the patient care device. In one embodiment, the device rejects, modifies or accepts an event from an input by utilizing information from the at least one motion event.