Motion Object Classification via Bayesian Feature Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for classifying objects in motion using multiple sensors and observations fail to adequately represent statistical dependencies due to high dimensionality and infinite possible trajectories, leading to sparse data sets and sub-optimal classification results.

Innovation Solution

The method involves providing feature data indexed by object class, orientation, and sensor, along with representative models for orientation motion profiles, acquired through multiple sensors and time instances, using Bayes' Rule to classify target objects based on posterior probabilities, generating reference feature vectors, and performing Bayesian classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If training data is generated offline over a subset of all possible trajectories and sensor observation times, then the data generation process is manageable, but the resulting data set becomes sparse and does not adequately represent the statistics for successful classification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata generation processVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by generating training data offline before actual target observation. Representative motion profiles are pre-computed for various object classes, and training datasets are constructed in advance covering multiple hypothetical trajectories and sensor observation times. This allows the classification system to be pre-trained on diverse scenarios, improving its ability to handle real-world variations without requiring exhaustive real-time data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the number of possible trajectories and observation times is considered, then the dimensionality of the joint feature space becomes large and unknown, but attempting to capture all dependencies becomes computationally infeasible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatistical representationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the high-dimensional joint feature space by introducing motion profiles as intermediate representations. Instead of directly modeling all possible trajectory-combination features, the system divides the problem into: (1) object class identification, (2) motion profile matching, and (3) trajectory-specific feature extraction. This segmentation reduces the effective dimensionality by grouping similar trajectories under common motion profiles, making the classification task computationally tractable while preserving statistical dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces motion profiles as an additional dimensional layer in the feature space. Rather than directly navigating the exponentially growing joint feature space of multiple sensors and trajectories, the system adds a motion profile dimension that organizes and structures the data. This dimensional transformation allows the system to capture temporal and spatial dependencies efficiently by representing them through standardized motion profile templates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If observations are assumed to be independent, then the computational complexity is reduced, but the classification performance becomes sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces motion profiles as intermediary structures that capture dependencies between multiple sensor observations. Instead of directly modeling complex inter-observation dependencies, the system uses motion profiles as mediators that encode temporal and spatial relationships. Each observation is evaluated in the context of its corresponding motion profile, allowing the system to account for dependencies between observations while maintaining computational efficiency through the structured intermediate representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8625905B2Classification of target objects in motion
Publication Date: 2014.01.07 RAYTHEON CO
  • US8625905B2 patent drawing
  • US8625905B2 patent drawing
  • US8625905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for classifying objects in motion that includes providing, to a processor, feature data for one or more classes of objects to be classified, wherein the feature data is indexed by object class, orientation, and sensor. The method also includes providing, to the processor, one or more representative models for characterizing one or more orientation motion profiles for the one or more classes of objects in motion. The method also include acquiring, via a processor, feature data for a target object in motion from multiple sensors and/or for multiple times and trajectory of the target object in motion to classify the target object based on the feature data, the one or more orientation motion profiles and the trajectory of the target object in motion.