Motion Controller Parameter Verification for Safe Machine Setup
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for checking motion controller parameters are labor-intensive, require expert knowledge, and lack automated validation, posing risks to machine safety due to potential grossly incorrect parameterization.
Innovation Solution
A verification method where a checking device evaluates parameters for compliance with defined physical conditions, determining these conditions using other parameters within the parameter set, enabling automated and comprehensive checks.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual review of parameters is performed by experts, then parameter accuracy and safety are improved, but time consumption and complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by performing automated plausibility checks and consistency verifications on motion control parameters before the actual machining operation begins. The system validates parameter relationships, checks for gross errors, and verifies consistency between different parameter sets in advance, preventing unsafe parameterizations from reaching the execution stage while eliminating the need for time-consuming manual expert reviews during operation setup
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements self-service by enabling the motion control system to automatically verify its own parameter configurations through built-in validation rules and consistency checks. The parameter verification device autonomously evaluates parameter plausibility, detects contradictions in parameter relationships, and identifies potential safety issues without requiring external expert intervention, allowing the system to self-validate its configuration state
2Measurement precision
If comprehensive parameter checks are performed manually, then parameter consistency and accuracy are improved, but ease of operation deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual expert review with an automated electronic verification system. The system uses computer-based algorithms to automatically check parameter plausibility, validate consistency relationships, and detect errors in motion control parameter configurations. This substitution eliminates the need for operators to manually examine numerous parameters while maintaining high verification accuracy through systematic automated validation rules
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback by automatically providing verification results and error notifications to operators. When parameter inconsistencies or plausibility violations are detected, the system generates immediate feedback indicating the nature of the error and its location in the parameter set, enabling operators to quickly identify and correct issues without performing comprehensive manual checks
3Productivity
If automated parameter verification is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies segmentation by dividing the parameter verification process into distinct modular components: plausibility check modules for individual parameters, consistency verification modules for parameter relationships, and safety validation modules for critical parameter combinations. Each module independently validates specific aspects of the parameter configuration, allowing the complex verification task to be broken down into manageable, reusable components that can be systematically applied without overwhelming system complexity
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3~4
Figure 5
AI summary
When executing a sub-program (2) defining a useful processing action, a movement controller (1) uses parameters of a parameter set (6) comprising a plurality of parameters to determine control commands, using commands (3) of the sub-program (2) and actual values (x, v) of a number (n) of axes (A) of a machine controlled by the movement controller (1), for drives (D) of the machine which are associated with the axes (A) and to apply the determined control commands to the drives (D). A checking device (7) checks the parameters for compliance with conditions defined by respective physical characteristics. In many cases, the checking device (7) can determine the respective physical characteristics using other parameters of the parameter set (6).