Self-Learning Motion Sickness Profile System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for mitigating motion sickness in vehicles are not individualized and fail to adapt effectively to personal differences in vulnerability and countermeasure effectiveness, leading to inadequate relief for vehicle occupants.

Innovation Solution

A self-learning system utilizing artificial intelligence to create and optimize individual profiles for motion sickness susceptibility, incorporating data from various sources such as questionnaires, physiological monitoring, and vehicle settings, which predicts and adjusts countermeasures in real-time to prevent or reduce motion sickness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a standardized questionnaire is used to determine motion sickness tendency, then the determination process is simple and quick, but the result lacks individualization and cannot adapt to personal differences in vulnerability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination process simplicityVSAvoidindividualization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the motion sickness determination from a static questionnaire-based approach to a continuous, multi-source data collection process that updates individual profiles over time, enabling the system to evolve from generic to highly individualized assessments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where questionnaire results, physiological data, and actual motion sickness occurrences are continuously fed back to refine and update individual motion sickness profiles, improving the accuracy and personalization of future predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If countermeasures are selected based on general guidelines, then the selection process is straightforward, but the effectiveness varies significantly across different individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecountermeasure selection simplicityVSAvoidcountermeasure effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring countermeasure recommendations to each individual's specific motion sickness profile, physiological characteristics, and historical response data, rather than applying uniform general guidelines to all users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting countermeasure selection based on multiple varying factors including individual susceptibility profiles, current physiological state, environmental conditions, and historical effectiveness data, optimizing recommendations for each specific situation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple data sources are integrated for individual profiling, then the accuracy of motion sickness prediction improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion sickness prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple data sources including questionnaire results, physiological sensor data, vehicle motion data, and environmental information into a unified individual motion sickness profile, integrating diverse inputs to achieve comprehensive and accurate predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a multi-functional platform that handles data collection, processing, storage, analysis, and recommendation generation within a single integrated architecture, reducing overall system complexity despite the multiple functions performed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system continuously learns and updates individual profiles, then the personalization and effectiveness of recommendations improve, but the computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by updating individual motion sickness profiles at strategically determined intervals based on data availability, journey stages, and changes in physiological or environmental conditions, rather than continuously processing all data in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and storing raw data from various sources during data collection phases, and pre-establishing baseline profiles before journeys begin, reducing the computational burden during actual motion sickness prediction and countermeasure recommendation phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11648952B2Methods and systems for controlling motor vehicle functions for controlling motion sickness
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11648952B2 patent drawing
  • US11648952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for avoiding or mitigating motion sickness in a vehicle are disclosed herein. The systems and methods may include (a) determining a profile of the individual inclination towards motion sickness; (b) predicting an individual effectiveness of countermeasures based on typing using the data from step (a); (c) evaluating the actual effectiveness of the predicted countermeasures after their implementation when travelling in the vehicle; wherein step (a) is repeated regularly and all data and results from step (c) are fed into a self-learning system in order to obtain an improved statement on the individual actual effectiveness of countermeasures taken and to make the selection of effective countermeasures based on them.