Motion Simulator Segmented Platform Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional motion simulators, such as the Steward platform, are complex and expensive due to their reliance on multiple telescoping actuators, making it difficult to control desired motions and limiting the range of simulated experiences, while simplified platforms struggle to replicate realistic motions effectively.

Innovation Solution

A motion simulator design featuring a base, a motion platform, a carrying platform, a support assembly with actuators and support tubes, and a driver assembly that allows for independent control of motion, enabling the simulation of various motions like pitch, roll, and yaw with a simpler structure and reduced cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a Steward platform with six telescoping actuators is used, then various motions can be simulated, but the structure complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion simulation capabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion simulation system is divided into two independent platforms: a motion platform for simulating vehicle body motions (pitch, roll, yaw) and a carrying platform for holding the passenger. This segmentation allows each platform to be controlled independently by separate actuators, reducing the overall complexity compared to a single six-actuator system while maintaining full motion simulation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The motion platform is designed to perform multiple functions using a reduced number of actuators. By strategically positioning three actuators on the motion platform, the system can simulate all three rotational motions (pitch, roll, yaw) that were previously required six actuators to achieve, thereby achieving multi-functionality with fewer components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If the number of actuators is reduced to simplify the structure, then cost and control complexity decrease, but the range of simulated motions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidmotion range
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from controlling all motions through a single complex platform to a two-dimensional control approach: the motion platform handles rotational motions (pitch, roll, yaw) while the carrying platform handles positional movements. This dimensional separation allows three actuators on the motion platform to achieve full rotational motion coverage without limiting the overall motion range of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The support assembly incorporating telescoping actuators provides dynamic adjustment capability, allowing the carrying platform to move relative to the motion platform in addition to the motion platform's rotational movements. This dynamic configuration enables the system to achieve a comprehensive range of motions with fewer actuators by utilizing combined movements from both platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If six telescoping actuators are used for full motion simulation, then motion versatility is achieved, but the control difficulty increases due to interdependence of actuator movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion simulation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two independent control loops: one for the motion platform controlling rotational motions and another for the carrying platform controlling positional movements. This segmentation eliminates the interdependence problem where movement of one actuator affected others, making control simpler and more straightforward while maintaining full motion simulation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The motion platform serves as an intermediary between the base and the carrying platform, decoupling the control requirements. The three actuators on the motion platform handle rotational control independently, while the support assembly actuators handle carrying platform positioning independently, acting as intermediaries that separate the control functions and reduce overall control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11717761B2Motion simulator
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 BROGENT TECH
  • US11717761B2 patent drawing
  • US11717761B2 patent drawing
  • US11717761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motion simulator comprises a base, a motion platform, a carrying platform, a support assembly and a driver assembly for simulating different motions. The motion platform is movably connected to the base, the carrying platform comprises a carrier arranged on the carrying platform, the support assembly is movably connected to the motion platform and the carrying platform, and the driver assembly drives the motion platform to move relative to the base and drives the actuator to actuate the carrying platform to move relative to the motion platform. The support assembly further includes an actuator and a support tube that are movably connected between the motion platform and the carrying platform, respectively.