Navigation System Motion Threshold Detour

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle navigation systems fail to automatically determine and provide effective alternate routes when a vehicle slows or stops due to traffic or road conditions, leading to inefficiencies in reaching a destination.

Innovation Solution

A navigation system that includes a motion sensor to detect vehicle velocity and a controller that generates alternate routes if the vehicle's motion falls below a predetermined threshold, allowing for automatic or user-initiated route replanning to avoid congested areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the navigation system continues along the primary route without monitoring vehicle motion, then the route guidance remains simple and unchanged, but the system fails to adapt to traffic conditions and cannot provide effective alternate routes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of vehicle motion parameters (velocity, acceleration) continuously along the primary route before any detour is needed. This advance detection allows the system to prepare alternate routes in advance and switch seamlessly when motion thresholds are violated, improving adaptability without adding complex real-time decision architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The navigation system incorporates feedback from motion sensors that continuously monitor vehicle velocity and acceleration. When the vehicle's motion falls below predetermined thresholds (indicating traffic congestion or stopped conditions), the system receives feedback and automatically generates alternate routes. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables adaptive route planning while maintaining relatively simple system architecture through threshold-based triggering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the system generates alternate routes automatically based on motion thresholds, then the system responds effectively to traffic conditions, but the system complexity increases due to additional sensors and control logic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute planning efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation system performs self-service route replanning by automatically monitoring its own vehicle motion parameters and triggering alternate route generation when thresholds are violated. The system serves itself by using onboard motion sensors to detect congestion conditions and autonomously determining when route changes are necessary, eliminating the need for external intervention or complex centralized control while improving routing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes in motion thresholds (velocity, acceleration) as triggering conditions for route replanning. By monitoring changes in these physical parameters and comparing them against predetermined values, the system achieves efficient automatic route selection without requiring complex decision-making algorithms or additional computational overhead, thus improving productivity with minimal complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the navigation system monitors vehicle motion continuously, then the system can detect stopped or slowed conditions and provide timely alternate routes, but the energy consumption and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute guidance reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring of vehicle motion parameters at predetermined intervals rather than continuous high-frequency analysis. This periodic action maintains reliable detection of stopped or slowed conditions while significantly reducing computational load and energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring, achieving a balance between reliability and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from motion sensors that trigger route replanning only when predetermined motion thresholds are violated. This threshold-based feedback mechanism ensures reliable detection of problematic conditions while minimizing unnecessary computational processing and energy consumption during normal driving conditions, thereby maintaining reliability without excessive energy expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7590490B2Smart detour
Publication Date: 2009.09.15 MITAC INT CORP
  • US7590490B2 patent drawing
  • US7590490B2 patent drawing
  • US7590490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of and apparatus for generating an alternate route for a system to travel to a predetermined destination are described. The method comprises determining a velocity of a system traveling along a primary route; and generating an alternate route to the primary route if the system velocity is below a predetermined motion threshold. A navigation system for generating an alternate route to a destination includes a motion sensor for detecting the navigation system velocity along a primary route and a controller coupled with the motion sensor. The controller receives a motion signal indicating navigation system motion and generates an alternate route to the primary route responsive to the motion signal indicating navigation system motion different from a predetermined motion threshold value.