Vehicle Motion Tracking Abnormality Detection for Control Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control devices face reduced motion estimation accuracy when tracking objects after temporary detection failures, leading to inadequate vehicle control, necessitating accurate abnormality determination of motion estimation for safe vehicle operation.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device with a detection unit, tracking unit, type determination unit, model storage unit, model selection unit, abnormality determination unit, and control unit that compares estimated motion with pre-defined motion models to determine abnormality and adjust control modes accordingly, incorporating positional and traveling state-specific motion models to enhance accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If the tracking unit tracks a moving object after a temporary detection failure, then the tracking continuity is maintained, but the motion estimation accuracy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking continuityVSAvoidmotion estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The abnormality determination unit continuously monitors the tracking results and provides feedback by comparing estimated motion with motion model predictions. When detection failures occur and tracking continues, the feedback mechanism detects the degradation in motion estimation accuracy and triggers abnormality determination to prevent unsafe control actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct reliance on continuous sensor detection with a model-based verification system. Instead of mechanically requiring uninterrupted detection, the system substitutes a virtual model comparison approach where the motion model predicts expected behavior and validates whether tracked objects conform to these predictions, compensating for detection gaps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If the vehicle control device uses motion models for abnormality determination, then the accuracy of abnormality detection is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion models serve multiple functions: they predict future positions of tracked objects, provide reference for abnormality determination, and enable verification of tracking accuracy. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate verification systems, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while maintaining high abnormality detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by introducing model-based predicted positions and motion characteristics as additional verification criteria. Instead of increasing hardware complexity, the patent modifies the control logic to incorporate model parameters (expected position, velocity, acceleration) that serve as reference values for detecting abnormalities in real-time tracking data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the abnormality determination unit compares estimated motion with motion model predictions, then the reliability of vehicle control is improved, but the computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control reliabilityVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The motion models pre-calculate and store expected motion patterns, position trajectories, and velocity profiles for various scenarios before they are needed. This preliminary preparation allows the abnormality determination unit to perform rapid comparisons during real-time operation, improving reliability without proportionally increasing computation time during critical control moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial verification by comparing only critical parameters (position, velocity, acceleration) against motion model predictions rather than analyzing all tracking data in full detail. This selective comparison approach maintains high reliability for safety-critical decisions while limiting computation time to essential verification tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11809194B2Target abnormality determination device
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11809194B2 patent drawing
  • US11809194B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device includes a tracking unit estimating a motion of a moving object, a model selection unit selecting a motion model corresponding to a moving object type, an abnormality determination unit determining a presence or absence of an abnormality of the estimation of the motion of the moving object based on the estimated moving object motion and the motion indicated by the motion model, and a control unit. A control mode in which the control unit controls traveling of a host vehicle when the abnormality determination unit determines that the abnormality is present differs from a control mode in which the control unit controls the traveling of the host vehicle when the abnormality determination unit determines that the abnormality is absent.