3D Motion Tracking Interface for Drone Path and Camera Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for controlling aircraft vehicles, such as drones, using a two-stick controller are difficult to operate effectively, especially when controlling both the flight path and camera orientation simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

A motion tracking interface is implemented using an electronic device that allows users to plan and control a travel path within a three-dimensional virtual map, utilizing various localization systems to determine device location and orientation, and communicate execution plans to the vehicle, which includes sensors for stabilization and navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a two-stick controller is used to control flight path and camera orientation, then the drone can be controlled, but the operation becomes difficult and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control system into two independent components: a motion controller for flight path control and a separate device for camera orientation control. This segmentation allows each controller to specialize in one function, simplifying the operation of each individual controller while maintaining comprehensive control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a communication interface between the motion controller and camera controller that allows automatic transmission of control signals. This intermediary system enables the motion controller to automatically adjust camera orientation based on flight movements, reducing the operational burden on the pilot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a pilot operator controls both flight path and camera orientation simultaneously, then complete control is achieved, but operational effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational effectivenessVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control functions are segmented between a motion controller handled by the pilot and a camera controller that can be operated separately or automatically. This division allows the pilot to focus on flight path control while camera operations are either simplified or automated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The camera controller is designed to automatically receive and execute control signals from the motion controller, adjusting camera orientation based on flight movements without requiring constant manual intervention. This self-service capability reduces the pilot's operational burden while maintaining effective camera control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11355019B2Motion tracking interface for planning travel path
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 AEROCINE VENTURES INC
  • US11355019B2 patent drawing
  • US11355019B2 patent drawing
  • US11355019B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device projects a virtual three-dimensional map of a physical environment onto an area captured by an image sensor of the device. The device receives user input to begin tracking device motion. In response to receiving the user input, the device tracks its motion within the area. The device determines location data within the area and orientation data of the image sensor within the area based on the tracked motion of the device. At least one of the location data or the orientation data is converted to real-world coordinates based on the virtual three-dimensional map of the physical environment. Path data is generated for a physical vehicle based on the at least one converted location or orientation data.