Motion Vector Refinement Using SATD for Video Coding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current motion vector refinement methods in video coding, such as those used in VVC, do not optimally minimize transformed and quantized residual coefficients, leading to inefficiencies in compression, particularly in homogeneous areas where SAD is large despite easy compression in the frequency domain, and in complex areas where high-frequency information is difficult to compress.

Innovation Solution

The method involves refining motion vectors based on the sum of absolute transformed differences (SATD) instead of sum of absolute differences (SAD), using transforms like Hadamard, DCT, or DST to assess the accuracy of motion vectors, and applying downsampling and secondary transforms to reduce computational complexity while maintaining coding efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If motion vector refinement uses SAD (sum of absolute differences), then computational complexity is reduced, but compression efficiency deteriorates because it does not optimally minimize transformed and quantized residual coefficients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for motion vector refinement from SAD (spatial domain metric) to SATD (frequency domain metric). This parameter change allows the system to minimize transformed and quantized residual coefficients more effectively, improving compression efficiency while the transform is applied to the difference between reference blocks and predicted blocks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a transform (Hadamard, DCT, or DST) as an intermediary step between block difference calculation and SAD computation. This intermediary transform converts spatial domain differences into frequency domain representation, allowing better optimization of residual coefficients before the final comparison metric is calculated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If motion vector refinement uses SATD (sum of absolute transformed differences), then coding efficiency is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion vector accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the evaluation metric from SAD to SATD, where the transform is applied to the block difference. This parameter change improves motion vector accuracy by better predicting residual energy in the frequency domain, which is where the actual compression occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the transform only to the difference block rather than to the entire reference or predicted blocks. This partial action approach achieves the necessary frequency domain analysis for accuracy improvement while avoiding the excessive computational cost of transforming large blocks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If downsampling and secondary transforms are applied, then computational complexity is reduced, but measurement precision may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidmotion vector refinement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential frequency information needed for motion vector refinement by applying downsampling after the transform. This extraction approach reduces computational complexity by working with smaller downsampled data while retaining the most important frequency components for accurate motion estimation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing levels to different regions or blocks based on their characteristics. By using secondary transforms and selective downsampling, the system maintains high precision where needed while reducing complexity in regions where full precision is less critical, optimizing the overall balance between accuracy and computational load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11601651B2Method and apparatus for motion vector refinement
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
  • US11601651B2 patent drawing
  • US11601651B2 patent drawing
  • US11601651B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method and an apparatus for motion vector refinement. An exemplary method includes: determining a plurality of first blocks associated with a first motion vector and a plurality of second blocks associated with a second motion vector; determining a sum of absolute transformed difference (SATD) between one of the plurality of first blocks and one of the plurality of second blocks; and refining the first motion vector and the second motion vector based on the determined SATDs.