Motor Abnormality Diagnosis Using Healthy System Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional abnormality diagnosis methods for motor systems, such as those in electric aircraft, vehicles, and ships, face challenges in accurately detecting abnormalities when phase current values are below threshold or within predetermined ranges, leading to undetected issues.

Innovation Solution

An abnormality diagnosis system that identifies a comparison target system among multiple motor systems, acquires state-related values like phase current, and compares them to diagnose abnormalities by determining differences exceeding predefined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional abnormality diagnosis methods use predetermined threshold values for phase current, then the diagnosis method is simple to implement, but abnormalities with phase current below threshold or within range are not detected accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection accuracyVSAvoiddiagnosis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the healthy motor system by selecting a comparison target motor from the plurality of motors that is determined to be in a healthy state. This comparison target serves as a reference model to compare against the diagnosis target, enabling accurate abnormality detection without complex threshold settings by simply comparing state-related values between the two systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes from using fixed predetermined threshold values to using dynamic comparison based on state-related values from a healthy comparison target. By selecting a comparison target motor and comparing its state-related values (such as phase current, temperature, vibration) with the diagnosis target, the system adapts to varying operating conditions and accurately detects abnormalities across different ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional methods use fixed threshold ranges for diagnosis, then the diagnosis process is straightforward, but false negatives occur when phase current is below threshold or within predetermined range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic reliabilityVSAvoiddiagnosis operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a reliable reference by copying the operational characteristics of a healthy motor (the comparison target) and uses this reference to evaluate the diagnosis target. This approach improves diagnostic reliability by comparing actual values against a dynamic healthy reference rather than static thresholds, reducing false negatives while maintaining operational simplicity through automated comparison logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification of a comparison target motor that is determined to be in a healthy state before conducting the abnormality diagnosis. This preliminary action establishes a reliable baseline for comparison, ensuring that the diagnosis process starts with a known good reference, thereby improving reliability without significantly increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the system compares state-related values between multiple motor systems, then abnormality detection accuracy improves, but the complexity of the diagnosis system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection precisionVSAvoidcomparison system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the plurality of motor systems into two distinct groups: a diagnosis target system and a comparison target system. This segmentation allows the system to perform focused comparisons between one diagnosis target and one selected healthy comparison target, rather than requiring complex multi-dimensional comparisons across all systems, thereby improving detection precision while controlling system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a comparison target motor as a virtual copy or reference model of a healthy system. By copying the operational characteristics of this healthy reference and comparing it with the diagnosis target, the system achieves high abnormality detection precision without the need for complex analysis of all motor systems simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11872898B2Abnormality diagnosis system and abnormality diagnosis method
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 DENSO CORP
  • US11872898B2 patent drawing
  • US11872898B2 patent drawing
  • US11872898B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An abnormality diagnosis system performs an abnormality diagnosis of a plurality of motor systems that include a motor for moving a moving body. The abnormality diagnosis system identifies a comparison target system that is the motor system, among the motor systems, that is a comparison target in relation to a diagnosis target system that is the motor system to be a target of the abnormality diagnosis. The abnormality diagnosis system acquires a state-related value that is a value related to an operation state of the motor from each of the diagnosis target system and the comparison target system. The abnormality diagnosis system performs a comparison of the state-related value that is acquired from the diagnosis target system and the state-related value that is acquired from the comparison target system, and diagnoses a presence or absence of an abnormality in the diagnosis target system using a result of the comparison.