Motor-Assisted Spring Hinge for Low-Power Autonomous Door Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor-driven hinges for doors covering compartments in household appliances are bulky, expensive, and consume high power, making them difficult to couple with pre-existing hinges and posing challenges in manual operation and power failure scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A hinge design incorporating elastic means to impose a predefined law of motion, combined with controlled motor means that apply a push or pull force, allowing for efficient operation with lower power consumption and ease of manual control, and can be easily coupled with existing hinges by using a motion-guide bar to transmit axial forces without stressing the hinge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If motor means are sized to fully open and close the door independently, then the door can operate autonomously, but the motor becomes bulky and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous door operationVSAvoidmotor size and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door movement function is segmented between passive elastic means (spring) that provide the main opening/closing force and active motor means that only provide aiding force. This segmentation allows the motor to be smaller and less expensive while the spring handles the bulk of the work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spring acts as a counterweight system, storing potential energy when the door is closed and releasing it to assist opening. The motor works alongside this counterweight system rather than replacing it, reducing the motor's burden and size requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Extent of automation

If a traditional hinge is replaced by an electric motor, then autonomous operation is achieved, but manual operation becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous door operationVSAvoidmanual operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge system is designed to serve multiple functions: the spring provides both manual operation assistance and autonomous operation support, while the motor provides aiding force in both manual and automated modes. This multi-functionality ensures neither mode sacrifices ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring acts as an intermediary between the motor and the door, providing a mechanical assistance layer that works whether the motor is active or not. This intermediary ensures continuous ease of operation regardless of automation mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If motor means are used to fully open and close the door, then complete automation is achieved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor automationVSAvoidmotor power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motor performs only partial action, providing aiding force rather than complete force for door operation. The spring handles the excessive action of full opening/closing, allowing the motor to consume less energy while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Extent of automation

If pre-existing hinges are replaced with motor-driven hinges, then automation is achieved, but compatibility with existing structures is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinge automationVSAvoidcompatibility with pre-existing hinges
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the traditional hinge structure (including spring and pivot) with a supplemental motor assembly. This combination allows the new automated hinge to be coupled with pre-existing hinge structures, maintaining compatibility while adding automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a compact, cost-effective hinge that can operate during power failures and malfunctions, reducing power consumption and allowing for easy integration with pre-existing hinges, while maintaining efficient door opening and closing functionality.

Implementation Method 1

means to impose a predefined law of motion to the mobile support with respect to the fixed support during opening and/or closing of said door, constituted by elastic means operatively interposed between the fixed support and the mobile support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

controlled motor means for aiding opening and/or closing of the door. Said controlled motor means apply a push and/or a pull force onto the mobile support with respect to the fixed support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP2946057B1hinge
Publication Date: 2019.08.14 FARINGOSI HINGES SRL
  • EP2946057B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2946057B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Hinge (1) for a door which covers at least in part a compartment, of the type comprising a fixed support (2) coupled to the compartment frame, and a mobile support (3) coupled to the door, wherein such mobile and fixed supports are at least rotatably constrained one to the other. The hinge also comprises means to impose a predefined law of motion to the mobile support with respect to the fixed support during opening and/or closing of the door and controlled motor means (5) for aiding opening and/or closing of the door applying a push and/or a pull force onto said mobile support with respect to the fixed one.