Electric Motor Auto-Tuning Using Virtual Damping Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing static auto-tuning methods for electric motors are complex, calculation intensive, and costly, with limited accuracy and safety concerns due to unpredictable rotor displacement and speed response during tuning.

Innovation Solution

A less complex and less costly static auto-tuning system and method that uses a closed-loop feedback mechanism and a virtual damping coefficient to accurately determine inertia and friction coefficient values, and subsequently calculate gains for improved motor control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional static auto-tuning methods are used to determine motor characteristics, then estimation accuracy is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for accurate estimation by using peak detection of the speed response signal rather than performing comprehensive spectral analysis. This removes unnecessary computational complexity while retaining the core functionality of characterizing system dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex signal processing to extract parameters from noisy data, the patent inverts the approach by designing an excitation signal that produces a clean, measurable speed response with distinct peaks. The system characteristics are derived from the timing and magnitude of these peaks rather than from complex spectral decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If complex signal processing algorithms like FFT are used to reduce noise effects, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by designing the excitation signal characteristics in advance to inherently produce a speed response with clearly distinguishable peaks. This pre-planned signal structure eliminates the need for complex post-processing noise reduction algorithms, as the measurement signal itself is optimized for clarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If vibrational torque command is used to estimate parameters in frequency domain, then productivity of parameter estimation is improved, but reliability decreases due to unpredictable rotor displacement and speed response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter estimation speedVSAvoidsafety control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the speed response during the tuning process and using this information to determine when parameter estimation is complete. The closed-loop feedback ensures that the excitation signal is applied only when safe and that the process can be terminated if abnormal conditions occur, thereby improving reliability while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250189942A1System and method for static auto-tuning electric motor
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 NIDEC MOTOR CORP
  • US20250189942A1 patent drawing
  • US20250189942A1 patent drawing
  • US20250189942A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A static auto-tuning system and method for controlling operation of a motor in a system. A speed reference signal is generated resulting in a speed response of the motor. Closed-loop feedback magnifies the rotating friction effect to an observable level. Inertia and rotating friction coefficient values of the system are estimated based on the speed frequency response and a virtual damping coefficient. A fixed low frequency speed signal may result in a first frequency response function for determining virtual damping, and a variable frequency excitation signal may result in a second frequency response function for determining the inertia and rotating friction characteristics. Closed-loop gains are determined based on these characteristics. The excitation signal may be sampled and a peak value in each interval may be identified and stored to produce an envelope of peak values for determining the gain response. Operation of the motor is controlled using the determined gains.