Motor Bracket Rib Design for Stiffness and Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reducing the height of a motor's bracket to minimize size and weight leads to reduced stiffness, causing bearing vibrations, which result in commutator wobbling, unstable contact between the commutator and brush, and sparking, thereby shortening the motor's lifespan.

Innovation Solution

A motor design featuring a cylindrical bracket with a rib structure that extends radially outward from the bearing holding portion, providing additional support and maintaining stiffness while allowing for a thinner profile, and a brush card assembly that ensures stable contact between the commutator and brush.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the thickness of the bracket is reduced to reduce motor size and weight, then the dimension of the bracket in height direction is reduced, but the stiffness of the bracket is lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebracket volumeVSAvoidbracket stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a rib structure that extends in the radial direction (another dimension) from the bearing holding portion. This adds structural support without increasing the axial thickness of the bracket, thus maintaining reduced size while improving stiffness locally where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The rib structure provides localized reinforcement at the bearing holding portion where stiffness is critical, rather than uniformly thickening the entire bracket. This allows the bracket to maintain thin overall dimensions while having enhanced stiffness in the specific region that supports the bearing and commutator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Volume of moving object

If the bracket stiffness is reduced due to thinner design, then the motor size is reduced, but the bearing begins to vibrate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebracket volumeVSAvoidbearing stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The rib extending radially outward from the bearing holding portion provides additional support in the radial direction, stabilizing the bearing without increasing the axial height of the bracket. This dimensional approach allows thin bracket design while maintaining bearing stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The rib structure is designed in advance to prevent bearing vibrations before they occur. By providing preemptive structural support at the bearing holding portion, the design prevents vibration-related issues rather than attempting to correct them after they arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Volume of moving object

If the bearing vibrates, then the motor size remains compact, but the commutator wobbles and separates from the brush

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor volumeVSAvoidcommutator-brush contact reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The radially extending rib provides structural support in the radial direction, preventing commutator wobble caused by bearing vibrations. This allows the motor to maintain compact axial dimensions while ensuring reliable commutator-brush contact through enhanced radial stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The rib structure preemptively prevents bearing vibrations that would lead to commutator wobble and brush separation. By addressing the root cause (bearing stability) in advance, the design ensures continuous reliable contact between the commutator and brush throughout operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Weight of stationary object

If the bracket is made thinner to reduce weight, then the motor weight is reduced, but sparking occurs between commutator and brush

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebracket weightVSAvoidsparking
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The rib structure extending radially provides the necessary stiffness to prevent commutator wobble and brush separation without increasing the axial thickness or weight of the bracket. This eliminates sparking while maintaining the lightweight advantage of the thin bracket design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The rib structure preemptively prevents the chain of events leading to sparking: by stabilizing the bearing and preventing commutator wobble before it occurs, the design eliminates the conditions that would cause brush separation and sparking, thereby preventing harmful effects before they arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10079519B2Motor
Publication Date: 2018.09.18 NIDEC CORP(JP)
  • US10079519B2 patent drawing
  • US10079519B2 patent drawing
  • US10079519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor may include a shaft, an armature, a commutator, a bearing, a housing, a bracket, and a brush card assembly. The brush card assembly may include a brush contacting the commutator, and a brush card holding the brush. The bracket may include a bracket bottom portion covering at least a portion of a lower side of the brush card, a cylindrical bracket cylindrical portion extending upwardly from a radially outer edge of the bracket bottom portion, a bearing holding portion extending upwardly from the bracket bottom portion at a radially inner side of the bracket cylindrical portion, and holding the bearing, and a rib positioned above the bracket bottom portion, and extending radially outward from the bearing holding portion.