Electromagnetic Motor Braking for Cut-Off Tool Kickback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrically powered cut-off tools for cutting concrete and stone face significant challenges in effectively mitigating kickback events, which can cause severe injuries due to the rapid ejection of the cutting disc, and existing solutions are either inadequate or require complex mechanical structures.

Innovation Solution

A control unit in the cut-off tool detects kickback conditions by monitoring angular velocity and initiates electromagnetic braking, regulating energy outtake to halt the cutting disc before it leaves the object, using an energy dissipating module to manage kinetic energy without mechanical brakes or external sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If electromagnetic braking is used to stop the cutting disc during kickback, then the braking response speed is improved, but the risk of component damage increases due to high energy outtake

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking response speedVSAvoidcomponent durability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the energy outtake from the electric motor during braking based on real-time kickback severity assessment. The control unit modulates the electromagnetic braking force to match the actual mitigation needs, preventing excessive energy dissipation that could damage components while ensuring rapid response when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit changes the electrical parameters (current, voltage, resistance) of the electric motor during braking to optimize the energy dissipation rate. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system achieves fast braking response while controlling the total energy outtake to prevent component damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If external sensors are added to detect kickback conditions, then the detection accuracy is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekickback detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electric motor itself serves as the sensing element by monitoring its own electrical characteristics (current, voltage, power consumption) during operation. The control unit detects kickback conditions by analyzing changes in these self-generated signals, eliminating the need for external sensors and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit performs multiple functions: it controls the motor during normal operation and simultaneously monitors electrical parameters to detect kickback conditions. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate detection systems, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If mechanical brakes are used to stop the cutting disc, then the braking reliability is improved, but the device complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical brake system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical brake system with electromagnetic braking using the electric motor itself. The motor's electromagnetic field provides the braking force through controlled current reversal or resistance insertion, eliminating mechanical contact components and reducing complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary between the kickback detection and the braking action. It processes the electrical parameter changes, determines the appropriate braking response, and controls the energy outtake from the motor, providing a reliable and integrated braking solution without mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If the braking force is increased to stop the cutting disc faster, then the kickback mitigation effectiveness is improved, but the energy outtake from the motor increases causing component stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekickback mitigation effectivenessVSAvoidenergy outtake during braking
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The braking force is dynamically adjusted based on the severity and duration of the kickback event. The control unit continuously monitors the electrical parameters and modulates the braking force accordingly, applying maximum force only when necessary and reducing it as the cutting disc slows down, optimizing both effectiveness and energy management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes electrical parameters (resistance, current, voltage) during the braking process to control energy dissipation. By adjusting these parameters in real-time, the system achieves effective kickback mitigation while managing the total energy outtake to prevent excessive component stress and heat generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution rapidly and effectively prevents kickback events, reducing the risk of injury and component damage by stopping the cutting disc before it leaves the workpiece, while avoiding the need for external sensors and complex mechanical structures.

Implementation Method 1

The control unit is arranged to obtain data indicative of an angular velocity of the cutting disc, and to detect a kickback condition based on an abrupt decrease in angular velocity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAngular velocity measurement:

Implementation Method 2

The control unit is also arranged to control an electromagnetic braking of the electric motor in response to detecting a kickback condition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic braking: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

The cut-off tool comprises an energy dissipating module configured to dissipate energy from the electric motor during the electromagnetic braking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy dissipation: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12558814B2Hand-held electrically powered cut-off tool with a kickback mitigation function
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 HUSQVARNA AB
  • US12558814B2 patent drawing
  • US12558814B2 patent drawing
  • US12558814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hand-held electrically powered cut-off tool (100) for cutting concrete and stone by a rotatable cutting disc (105), the cut-off tool (100) comprising an electric motor (130) arranged to be controlled by a control unit (110) via a motor control interface (120), wherein the control unit (110) is arranged to obtain data indicative of an angular velocity of the cutting disc (105), and to detect a kickback condition based on a decrease in angular velocity, wherein the control unit (110) is arranged to control an electromagnetic braking of the electric motor (130) in response to detecting a kickback condition, wherein the control unit (110) is arranged to determine an angular acceleration associated with the electric motor (130), and to detect the kickback condition based on a comparison between the determined angular acceleration and a configurable detection threshold.