Motor Control Apparatus Back-EMF Phase Detection Threshold Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor control methods experience frequent switching between constant current control and vector control, leading to instability and increased motor sound or out-of-control states due to inaccurate rotation phase determination at low speeds.

Innovation Solution

A motor control apparatus that determines the rotation phase and speed of a rotor, using threshold values to switch between constant current and vector control modes, ensuring accurate phase determination and minimizing mode switching by maintaining vector control until the rotation speed drops below a certain threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If vector control is used to accurately determine rotation phase, then motor control precision is improved, but at low rotation speeds the induced voltage becomes insufficient leading to inaccurate phase determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation phase determination accuracyVSAvoidrotation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from induced voltage-based phase determination to back-EMF-based phase determination. By using the relationship between back-EMF and rotation speed, the system can accurately determine rotation phase even at low speeds where induced voltage is insufficient. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by finding an alternative measurement basis that remains effective across the full speed range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If switching between constant current control and vector control is performed based on rotation speed threshold, then control adaptability is improved, but frequent switching causes motor sound increase and out-of-control states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mode adaptabilityVSAvoidmotor control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring rotation speed and dynamically adjusting the control mode based on real-time conditions. The system uses feedback from the rotation phase determination accuracy and motor response to decide when to switch between control modes, preventing frequent switching by only transitioning when the feedback indicates stable operating conditions are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system transitions from static threshold-based switching to dynamic adaptive switching. The control mode selection is no longer based on a fixed speed threshold but on dynamic assessment of phase determination accuracy and motor response characteristics, allowing the system to adapt smoothly to changing operating conditions without frequent mode transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If constant current control is used at low rotation speeds, then phase determination simplicity is improved, but motor control precision and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidmotor control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental control parameter from simple constant current to back-EMF-based phase-aware control. By utilizing the back-EMF signal which is naturally present during motor operation, the system achieves precise phase determination without adding significant complexity. This parameter change enables reliable motor control at low speeds while maintaining practical system complexity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces repetitive mode switching, stabilizes motor operation, and prevents out-of-control states by maintaining vector control until the rotation speed falls below a predetermined threshold, thereby minimizing motor sound and power consumption.

Implementation Method 1

the rotation phase of a rotor is determined based on induced voltage occurring in the winding of each phase of the motor in response to the rotation of the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a current component (torque current component) to generate torque used for rotating the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

a current component (excitation current component) that affects the strength of a magnetic flux through the windings for control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10277152B2Motor control apparatus, sheet conveying apparatus, image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 CANON KK
  • US10277152B2 patent drawing
  • US10277152B2 patent drawing
  • US10277152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor control apparatus operates in a first control mode in which the values of a torque current component and an excitation current component are controlled so that the difference between an instruction phase and a rotation phase is decreased and a second control mode in which constant current is supplied to a winding of a motor. The second control mode is switched to the first control mode if the rotation speed is varied from a value lower than a first threshold value to a value not lower than the first threshold value in the second control mode and the first control mode is kept even if the rotation speed is varied from a value not lower than the first threshold value to a value that is not lower than a second threshold value and that is lower than the first threshold value in the first control mode.