Motor Control Mode Switching via BEMF Pattern Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor control systems face challenges in transitioning from open-loop to closed-loop control modes efficiently, particularly at low speeds where BEMF signal noise is high, leading to unreliable rotor position detection and degraded performance.

Innovation Solution

A system that measures back-electromotive force (BEMF) signals during commutation states and switches from an initial open-loop control mode to a closed-loop mode based on detecting a predetermined pattern in the BEMF signal, eliminating the need for pre-defined speed or current thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If open-loop control is used at low speeds, then the motor can start operation, but the control precision and performance degrade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor startup capabilityVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between open-loop and closed-loop control modes based on motor speed. At low speeds, open-loop control is used for reliable startup. When the motor reaches a threshold speed where BEMF signals become reliable, the system automatically switches to closed-loop control for improved precision, thus adapting the control strategy to operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary open-loop control to bring the motor to a sufficient speed before switching to closed-loop control. This preliminary action ensures the motor is running reliably before transitioning to the more precise but speed-dependent closed-loop mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If closed-loop control is used at low speeds, then control precision improves, but BEMF signal noise causes unreliable operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidoperation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control mode parameter based on motor speed. Closed-loop control using BEMF signals is enabled only when the motor speed exceeds a threshold, ensuring the BEMF signal-to-noise ratio is sufficient for reliable operation. Below this threshold, the system uses open-loop control to maintain reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediate speed threshold condition that mediates between open-loop and closed-loop control modes. This intermediary condition ensures closed-loop control is only activated when BEMF signals are reliable, preventing noise-induced errors while still enabling precision control when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If manual tuning of speed or current thresholds is used, then control mode switching can be implemented, but system complexity and tuning effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mode switchingVSAvoidtuning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines the optimal switching point by monitoring BEMF signal characteristics and noise levels. Rather than requiring manual tuning of threshold parameters, the system self-adjusts by detecting when BEMF signals become sufficiently reliable, eliminating the need for extensive manual calibration while maintaining automated control mode switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from BEMF signal quality monitoring to automatically determine when to switch control modes. By continuously assessing the reliability of BEMF signals, the system autonomously makes switching decisions without requiring pre-configured thresholds or manual intervention, reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables automatic and efficient transition to closed-loop control at higher speeds, improving motor performance by ensuring stable BEMF signals and eliminating the need for manual tuning, thus enhancing system robustness and flexibility.

Implementation Method 1

The measurement logic measures a back-electromotive force (BEMF) signal representing a BEMF of an electric motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBack-electromotive force (BEMF): Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11444559B2Operational mode control of a motor
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US11444559B2 patent drawing
  • US11444559B2 patent drawing
  • US11444559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example is a system for controlling a motor during startup. The system includes measurement logic, pattern detection logic, and mode logic. The measurement logic monitors a back-electromotive force (BEMF) signal representing a BEMF of an electric motor and the pattern detection logic monitors this signal to detect instances of the monitored BEMF signal exhibiting a predetermined pattern. The mode logic enables control of the electric motor according to a plurality of modes of control. In some examples, the mode logic initially employs a first mode of control and switches from the first mode of control to a second mode of control in response to the pattern detection logic detecting that a BEMF signal exhibits the predetermined pattern over a plurality of commutation states.