Electric Motor Control Unit Fault Detection via Current Model Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for diagnosing faults in electric motors can incorrectly identify transient or noise conditions as faults due to limited parameter measurement, leading to false alarms and restricted fault detection capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A control unit for electric motors that uses a closed-loop control system with PI controllers, current sensors, and transforms (Clarke and Park) to estimate and compare motor current values, incorporating a fault counter to differentiate between transient conditions and actual faults by tracking differences over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fault identification is based directly on measured parameter values, then fault detection capability is provided, but false alarms occur due to transient or noise conditions being incorrectly identified as faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidparameter measurement sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by calculating expected parameter values using a motor model before comparing them with measured values. This preliminary calculation of expected values based on control inputs and motor model allows the system to anticipate normal parameter ranges, thereby filtering out transient noise while maintaining sensitivity to actual faults.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing measured parameter values with expected values and using this comparison to identify faults. The feedback mechanism involves calculating the difference between measured and expected values, and only triggering fault identification when this difference exceeds a threshold for a predetermined time period, thus eliminating false alarms from transient conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of measured parameters is increased to improve fault detection completeness, then more fault types can be identified, but the complexity of the measurement system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection coverageVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by introducing a motor model as a mediator between the measured parameters and fault identification. Instead of directly monitoring multiple complex parameters, the system uses the motor model to calculate expected values from a limited set of measured parameters, thereby achieving comprehensive fault detection coverage without increasing measurement system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces direct mechanical/electrical measurement of multiple parameters with a computational model-based approach. By substituting physical measurement complexity with mathematical modeling, the system can identify various fault types using a limited set of measured parameters processed through the motor model, thereby reducing measurement system complexity while maintaining fault detection versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2862270B1A method and control unit for an electric motor or generator
Publication Date: 2021.07.14 PROTEAN ELECTRIC LIMITED
  • EP2862270B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2862270B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2862270B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A control unit for identifying a fault in an electric motor or generator, the control unit comprising means for measuring a value of a first parameter associated with the operation of the electric motor or generator; means for increasing a counter value if the difference between the measured first parameter value or a value derived from the measured value and a second value is greater than a first predetermined value; means for decreasing the counter value if the difference between the measured first parameter value and the second value is less than the first predetermined value; and means for generating a signal indicative of a fault if the counter value exceeds a second predetermined value.