Motor Control Device Demagnetization Detection via Multi-Dimensional Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional motor control systems for machining tools face challenges in accurately detecting demagnetization, leading to delayed detection and potential machine collisions due to high threshold settings that prevent excessive detection but result in missing necessary demagnetization alerts.

Innovation Solution

A motor control device that monitors excitation and torque current common phase voltage differences, their first-order lag circuit outputs, velocity differences, and acceleration status to accurately detect demagnetization by setting thresholds based on theoretical values accounting for individual motor variations and control delays, ensuring prompt motor stoppage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high thresholds are set for voltage difference detection to prevent excessive detection, then false detection rate is reduced, but demagnetization detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse detection rateVSAvoiddemagnetization detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent detection dimensions: voltage difference detection, velocity difference detection, and acceleration status detection. Each dimension uses its own threshold and evaluation criteria. By segmenting the detection process, the system can use lower voltage difference thresholds without excessive false detections, because the final determination requires consensus across multiple detection dimensions rather than relying on a single high threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from one-dimensional voltage difference detection to multi-dimensional detection by incorporating velocity difference and acceleration status as additional detection dimensions. This dimensional expansion allows the system to detect demagnetization through multiple indicators simultaneously, enabling lower individual thresholds while maintaining overall detection accuracy through the combination of multiple detection results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If lower thresholds are set for voltage difference detection, then demagnetization detection accuracy is improved, but excessive detection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemagnetization detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple detection results (voltage difference, velocity difference, acceleration status) into a unified demagnetization determination. By combining these independent detection outcomes, the system achieves high detection sensitivity with lower individual thresholds while the merged evaluation logic prevents excessive false detections through cross-validation of multiple indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results from one dimension inform the evaluation of other dimensions. The integrated evaluation unit continuously monitors all detection dimensions and adjusts the overall determination based on the combined feedback, allowing lower thresholds to be used safely because the feedback loop can distinguish between transient anomalies and genuine demagnetization events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple detection parameters are monitored simultaneously, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device integrates multiple detection functions (voltage difference detection, velocity difference detection, acceleration detection) within a single integrated evaluation unit. This multi-functional design allows the system to monitor multiple parameters simultaneously while avoiding the complexity of separate independent detection systems, as the evaluation unit processes all parameters through a unified decision-making framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10135382B2Motor control device
Publication Date: 2018.11.20 OKUMA CORP
  • US10135382B2 patent drawing
  • US10135382B2 patent drawing
  • US10135382B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor control device calculates a velocity difference based on a velocity command and a velocity detection value of a motor and an excitation current common phase voltage difference based on an excitation current command value and an excitation current detection value, and judges that demagnetization occurs when the following conditions are all met: the excitation current common phase voltage difference exceeds a voltage threshold; the velocity difference exceeds a velocity threshold; and acceleration is being performed.