Motor Control Center Lineup Generation from Load Lists

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing process of designing and re-designing motor control centers and single-line diagrams for industrial automation systems is time-consuming and prone to delays, requiring multiple iterations and unnecessary data collection due to changes in customer specifications and preferences.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize historical data to generate motor control center lineups and single-line diagrams based on client input, allowing for real-time updates and modifications through a graphical user interface, by analyzing similarities with previous projects and integrating machine learning to improve recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual design process is used for motor control center and single-line diagram, then design flexibility and customization are improved, but design time and project delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing client data and historical data to identify similar projects before the actual design process begins. This advance preparation enables rapid generation of design recommendations when changes occur, reducing redesign time while maintaining flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of successful design patterns from historical data of similar projects. By copying proven design solutions and adapting them to current project requirements, the system rapidly generates design recommendations without manual redesign, significantly reducing design time while preserving customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If multiple queries to customer are made for updated data during design process, then data accuracy is improved, but project delays and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidproject delays
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring changes in client data and automatically triggering updates to the design process. When client data changes are detected, the system feeds this information back into the design engine, which re-generates recommendations based on the updated data, ensuring accuracy without requiring multiple manual customer queries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting data changes, querying relevant historical data, and updating designs without requiring repeated customer intervention. The system serves itself by maintaining an updated understanding of project requirements through automated data change detection and historical data retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive historical data analysis is performed to identify similar projects, then recommendation accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the historical data analysis into distinct modules: client data parsing, similarity identification, design pattern extraction, and recommendation generation. Each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive analysis capability. The segmentation allows parallel processing and independent optimization of each analysis component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If manual redesign is performed when customer specifications change, then design accuracy is maintained, but redesign time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign accuracyVSAvoidredesign speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by enabling real-time regeneration of design recommendations when client data changes are detected. Instead of static manual redesign processes, the system dynamically updates design recommendations based on current project requirements and historical patterns, maintaining design accuracy while dramatically improving redesign speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11360452B2System and method for generating a motor control center lineup based on a load list
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US11360452B2 patent drawing
  • US11360452B2 patent drawing
  • US11360452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system has a processor that receives client data defining one or more electrical loads of an industrial automation project. The computing system generates one or more motor control lineups based on the client data and historical data associated with a plurality of previous industrial automation projects. The computing system receives a selection of a motor control lineup form a plurality of motor control lineups. A visual representation of the selected motor control lineup is generated and transmitted for display on a graphical user interface.