Hands-Free Motor Control via Participant Movement Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Motor-assisted devices for activities like surfing and kayaking require participant interaction through throttle mechanisms, leading to fatigue and limiting the duration and enjoyment of these sports due to the need for manual control.

Innovation Solution

A motor control system that uses natural and inherent movements of the participant, combined with gesture communication and environmental noise management, to provide intuitive and hands-free control, leveraging kinematic sensors, optical systems, or a combination of both for enhanced user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If motor assistance is provided through throttle mechanisms requiring manual control, then motor assistance can be delivered to the participant, but participant fatigue increases and duration of activity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of controlVSAvoidduration of activity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects participant movements and activity states through sensors, and autonomously controls motor assistance levels without requiring manual throttle input. The control system serves itself by interpreting sensor data and making control decisions, freeing the participant from manual control tasks and reducing fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical throttle control with an automated electronic control system that uses sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers) to detect participant movements and translates these into motor control commands. This substitution eliminates the need for continuous manual mechanical input while maintaining precise motor assistance control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If external control devices with buttons are used for motor control, then motor assistance can be controlled, but user experience is degraded due to need for physical interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevel of automationVSAvoidease of control
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically interprets participant movements and activity states through integrated sensors and autonomously adjusts motor assistance levels. The system serves itself by detecting movements, determining activity states, and controlling the motor without requiring physical interaction with external control devices or buttons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the control system with the participant's body movements and the activity itself. By integrating sensors that detect natural participant movements and combining movement detection with activity state determination, the system creates a unified control mechanism where the participant's own actions become the control input, eliminating separate control devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Use of energy by moving object

If motor assistance is provided during all phases of activity, then continuous support is available, but energy consumption increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidconsistency of support
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts motor assistance levels based on real-time detection of participant movements and activity states. By continuously monitoring sensor data and adapting motor support to the current phase of activity, the system provides consistent assistance only when needed, optimizing energy efficiency while maintaining reliability of support throughout the activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system operates in periodic cycles, continuously detecting participant movements, determining activity states, and adjusting motor assistance in response to changing activity phases. This periodic operation ensures motor support is provided consistently during active phases while reducing or eliminating assistance during rest phases, improving overall energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11618540B2Motor control system based upon movements inherent to self-propulsion
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 MEDICI TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11618540B2 patent drawing
  • US11618540B2 patent drawing
  • US11618540B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The systems and methods described herein provide hands free motor control mechanisms based on the natural and inherent movements associated with an activity of interest, and can be combined with gestures or verbal communication based upon pre-defined movements by the participant.