Motor Control Device Fault Detection via Phase Voltage Deviation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional motor control devices face challenges in accurately detecting faulty phases during abnormal conditions, leading to potential erroneous detection and fail-safe control issues in electric power steering systems.

Innovation Solution

A motor control device that includes a drive circuit and a control unit for three-phase motor operation, with an abnormality detecting portion that determines current-carrying failures based on specific conditions such as current and voltage command values, motor angular velocity, and power supply voltage, to accurately identify faulty phases and prevent erroneous detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional fault detection methods are used that monitor current and voltage command values, then faulty phases can be detected, but normal phases may be erroneously identified as faulty due to current deviations in normal phases during abnormal conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoiderroneous detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fault detection is segmented into multiple independent determination conditions that must all be satisfied simultaneously: (1) current value deviation from command value, (2) voltage command value at upper or lower limit, (3) motor rotation angle range, and (4) duration of state. This segmentation allows the system to distinguish between transient deviations in normal phases and actual faults by requiring all conditions to be met, thereby reducing erroneous detection while maintaining fault detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors and compares actual current values with current command values, and voltage command values with limit values, creating a feedback mechanism that updates fault determination in real-time. This feedback approach allows the system to adapt to changing operating conditions and distinguish between normal variations and actual faults based on persistent deviation patterns across multiple parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple determination conditions are applied to prevent erroneous detection, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases due to additional monitoring parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs multiple functions simultaneously: it controls motor operation, generates current and voltage command values, monitors actual current and voltage values, determines fault conditions, and controls switching elements. By making the control unit multi-functional, the system adds fault detection capabilities without requiring separate dedicated hardware for each function, thereby improving reliability while minimizing the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If fail-safe control is implemented upon fault detection, then system safety improves, but productivity decreases due to motor operation restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoidmotor operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fail-safe control strategy is dynamic rather than static: upon detecting a faulty phase, the system transitions from three-phase control to two-phase control, allowing the motor to continue operating at reduced capability rather than shutting down completely. This dynamic adaptation maintains essential motor function and system safety while preserving partial productivity, balancing safety requirements with operational continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2787633B1Motor control device
Publication Date: 2019.05.22 JTEKT CORP
  • EP2787633B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2787633B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2787633B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A motor control device (4) includes a drive circuit (40) that supplies drive electric power in three phases to a motor (20), according to turning on or off of FETs (42u to 42w, and 43u to 43w); a microcomputer (41) that generates control signals (Sc1 to Sc6) for turning on or off the FETs (42u to 42w, and 43u to 43w). The microcomputer (41) computes phase voltage command values for the motor (20) through feedback control that causes phase current values for the motor to follow current command values, and generates the control signals (Sc1 to Sc6) based on the computed phase voltage command values. The microcomputer (41) detects a current-carrying failure in a U phase when all of (i) a condition that an absolute value of a U phase current value is less than a current determination value, (ii) a condition that a duty value corresponding to the U phase voltage command value is equal to or greater than a first duty determination value, or equal to or less than a second duty determination value; and (iii) a condition that the U phase voltage command value is deviated from the V phase and W phase voltage command values are satisfied.