Motor Control Voltage Stability via Regenerative Energy Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional motor drives face challenges in managing regenerated energy, as they either result in loss of active motor control or increased system complexity and cost when trying to prevent overvoltage due to absorbed energy, especially in applications with limited regeneration needs.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a power supply output sensor and a motor controller, which senses the output level of the power supply and adjusts the electrical current to the motor by reducing the torque-producing component as the output voltage approaches a predetermined limit, thereby mitigating overvoltage without interrupting active motor control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a regenerative energy dissipator is used to manage regenerated energy, then power supply voltage can be maintained within acceptable levels during rapid deceleration, but circuit and system complexity, size, and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply voltage stabilityVSAvoidcircuit and system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential function of voltage limitation from the complex regenerative energy dissipator system. Instead of using a large resistor switched across the power supply, the invention selectively limits voltage by controlling motor current during regeneration, removing unnecessary circuit components while maintaining voltage stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor controller uses the motor's own electrical characteristics and control capabilities to manage regenerated energy. By adjusting the current supplied to the motor during deceleration, the system self-regulates voltage levels without requiring external dissipator circuits, thereby reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If active motor control is interrupted to prevent overvoltage, then power supply and drive are protected from damage, but active motor control is lost and motor coasts until voltage decays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply protectionVSAvoidmotor control continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback control by monitoring power supply voltage during regeneration and dynamically adjusting motor current in real-time. This closed-loop control prevents overvoltage conditions while maintaining uninterrupted active motor control, eliminating the need to interrupt control or allow coasting behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a large resistor is switched into the circuit to dissipate regenerative energy, then excess energy is removed from the power supply, but system size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage limit enforcementVSAvoidsystem size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the large resistor component from the system entirely. Instead of physically dissipating energy through a resistive element, the system uses electronic control to manage regenerated energy by adjusting motor current, achieving voltage protection without adding bulky hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/electrical dissipator system (large resistor) with an electronic control system. By using the motor controller to manage energy flow and limit voltage through current control, the invention substitutes physical energy dissipation with electronic regulation, reducing system size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for continuous active motor control while preventing overvoltage, reducing system complexity and cost by leveraging power losses to manage regenerated energy, even in applications with modest energy management needs.

Implementation Method 1

During active motor control, the motor may behave as a generator, and stored or potential energy from the motor may be converted back into electrical energy (regenerated energy) that is absorbed by the power supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the motor may behave as a generator, and stored or potential energy from the motor may be converted back into electrical energy (regenerated energy) that is absorbed by the power supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS8598819B2Motor control
Publication Date: 2013.12.03 ANALOGIC CORP
  • US8598819B2 patent drawing
  • US8598819B2 patent drawing
  • US8598819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a power supply output sensor that senses an output level of a power supply during active motor control of a motor using the power supply and generates a signal indicative thereof. The motor regenerates energy and the power supply absorbs energy regenerated by the motor. The system also includes a motor controller that, in response to the signal satisfying a predetermined threshold, controls an electrical current supplied to the motor for active control of the motor based on a set of instructions that mitigate increases in the output level of the power supply from the absorption of the energy regenerated in the motor.