Electric Motor Controller Inertia Friction Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for estimating inertia and friction in electric motor-driven machine tools face challenges such as reduced accuracy due to torque offset and large Coulomb friction, require a wide operation range, and necessitate large data memory for data accumulation, making it difficult to precisely identify these parameters, especially in complex configurations and during rapid changes in workpiece attachment/detachment.

Innovation Solution

A controller that uses a sine wave or M-sequence instruction to estimate inertia and friction simultaneously, with sequential updating of parameters in every sampling period, reducing the need for extensive data accumulation and allowing for the estimation of both viscous and Coulomb friction, using an inverse transfer function model to minimize errors without requiring Fourier transforms or large memory.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing methods calculate inertia and friction from electric current feedback and acceleration, then estimation can be performed, but accuracy deteriorates when torque offset or large Coulomb friction is present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinertia estimation accuracyVSAvoidtorque offset and Coulomb friction influence
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic sine wave instructions to the motor drive shaft to generate periodic speed and acceleration variations. By using these periodic excitations, the system can distinguish between friction effects and inertial effects through phase analysis, thereby eliminating the harmful influence of torque offset and Coulomb friction on inertia estimation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical estimation methods with signal processing techniques. By substituting the mechanical approach of direct measurement with an electrical signal-based approach using sine wave excitations and spectral analysis, the system achieves higher accuracy while compensating for friction and offset effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If data accumulation over predetermined time is performed for least-squares estimation, then inertia and friction can be calculated, but large data memory is required and response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter estimation accuracyVSAvoiddata memory requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential frequency components (sine wave frequency and its harmonics) from the measured signals using spectral analysis methods. By taking out only the relevant information at specific frequencies rather than processing all accumulated data, the system achieves accurate parameter estimation with minimal memory requirements and faster response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If a wide operation range is required for accurate inertia and friction identification, then estimation accuracy improves, but the method becomes difficult to apply to machines with limited operation ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem constant identification accuracyVSAvoidapplicability to limited operation range machines
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic sine wave excitations that can be applied within any operation range. The periodic nature of the excitation allows accurate parameter identification regardless of the overall operation range, as long as the sine wave frequency fits within the available bandwidth, thereby improving adaptability to machines with limited operation ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Measurement precision

If Fourier transforms are used for spectral analysis, then frequency component extraction is accurate, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency component extraction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs computationally efficient algorithms such as Goertzel algorithm or simplified spectral analysis methods that provide sufficient accuracy for the specific application of parameter estimation. These lighter computational approaches replace full Fourier transforms, reducing processing complexity while maintaining adequate frequency component extraction accuracy for inertia and friction estimation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS8232758B2Controller of electric motor having function of estimating inertia and friction simultaneously
Publication Date: 2012.07.31 FANUC LTD
  • US8232758B2 patent drawing
  • US8232758B2 patent drawing
  • US8232758B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller estimates Coulomb friction itself together with inertia and viscous friction, and reduces the influence of the Coulomb friction on the accuracy of the estimated inertia. In addition, the controller estimates inertia, viscous friction and Coulomb friction simultaneously with sequential adaptation in which a Fourier transformer is not used but an inverse transfer function model is used in order to minimize the estimated error. Data sampled for a predetermined time need not be accumulated, as a result, a large amount of data memory is unnecessary.