Motor Drive Gulping Detection via Work Indicator Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional fault determination methods fail to capture all instances of 'gulping' phenomena in pumps, which occur when air enters and is removed due to water pressure fluctuations, leading to potential pump damage.

Innovation Solution

A gulping detection method involving a motor drive with processing instructions that determine a work indicator value, compare it to thresholds, and adjust a tracking variable accordingly to detect gulping events, utilizing current, power, or torque measurements to identify faults.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fault determination methods are used, then the system is simple and easy to operate, but gulping events cannot be reliably detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegulping detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the work indicator and comparing it against thresholds, then adjusting the tracking variable based on the comparison result. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables reliable detection of gulping events by dynamically responding to changes in pump operation conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking variable serves as an intermediary that accumulates evidence of gulping events over time. Instead of directly detecting gulping, the system uses the work indicator as an intermediate measurement that feeds into the tracking variable, which then triggers fault determination when thresholds are exceeded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If traditional fault determination methods are used, then the system requires minimal processing, but all instances of gulping cannot be captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegulping event information lossVSAvoidprocessing power
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously updating the tracking variable with each work indicator measurement, accumulating evidence before a fault is declared. This progressive accumulation ensures that transient or intermittent gulping events are captured over time rather than requiring high-power continuous analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system is dynamic, with the tracking variable adapting its value based on real-time work indicator measurements. The system dynamically adjusts the accumulated evidence of gulping events, allowing it to capture varying patterns of air intake and water pressure changes without requiring excessive processing power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the tracking variable is adjusted by large amounts, then gulping detection is more sensitive, but false positives increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegulping detection precisionVSAvoidfault determination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses partial action by adjusting the tracking variable by controlled amounts rather than extreme values. This moderate adjustment strategy balances sensitivity for detecting genuine gulping events while avoiding excessive reactions to normal variations, reducing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12025137B2Water gulping detection
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC
  • US12025137B2 patent drawing
  • US12025137B2 patent drawing
  • US12025137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to detect gulping in a pump driven by a motor drive to pump a liquid includes: determining a value of a work indicator corresponding to work performed by a pump pumping a liquid; comparing the value to a first threshold; changing a value of a tracking variable by a first amount if the value of the work indicator is below the threshold; changing the value of the tracking variable by a second amount if the value of the work indicator is above the threshold, wherein the first amount and the second amount have opposite signs; and determining that a gulping event occurred if an absolute value of the tracking variable is larger than an absolute value of a second threshold.