Motor-Generator Control Apparatus Rectangular Wave Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control methods for brushless motors require expensive magnetic pole position sensors and result in high switching losses, making them inefficient and costly for applications like light automobiles and motorcycles.

Innovation Solution

A control apparatus for a motor-generator using a simplified magnetic pole position sensor and a multi-phase inverter with switch elements driven by a rectangular wave pattern, reducing switching frequency and eliminating the need for precise magnetic pole detection, while using mass-produced general-purpose devices like MOSFETs and parasitic diodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If sinusoidal PWM controlled inverter is used to obtain stable rotational speed, then rotational speed stability is improved, but magnetic pole position sensor is required which increases cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational speed stabilityVSAvoidmagnetic pole position sensor
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the magnetic pole position sensor from the system by using a simplified sensorless control method that determines rotor position through back-EMF detection and rectangular wave control, thereby reducing cost while maintaining control functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the expensive magnetic pole position sensor with a cost-effective rectangular wave control approach that uses basic voltage detection circuits, achieving acceptable rotational speed stability at lower cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Ease of operation

If all elements are subject to switching to achieve speed control, then speed control capability is improved, but switching losses increase which lowers system efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed control capabilityVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic rectangular wave switching patterns with specific duty cycles (α and β angles) to control motor phases, reducing the frequency and duration of switching events compared to continuous PWM switching, thereby lowering switching losses while maintaining speed control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial switching control where only necessary phases are switched at specific times during the rectangular wave cycle, rather than continuously switching all elements, optimizing the balance between control capability and switching loss reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If high switching frequency is used for precise control, then control precision is improved, but cooling requirements increase and noise protection becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcooling and noise protection systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic rectangular wave control with optimized switching intervals (α>0° and β<180° constraints) to achieve adequate control precision at lower switching frequencies, reducing thermal and electromagnetic interference that would require complex cooling and noise protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves excellent rotating speed characteristics, reduces cooling and noise protection needs, and decreases switching losses by one-third, making the system more efficient and cost-effective for motor-generator applications.

Implementation Method 1

the switch element of a low side connected to the switch element of a high side in series is subject to PWM switching control while the switch element of the high side is in an off-state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPWM switching control:

Implementation Method 2

a stator which includes multi-phase coils connected so as to form a star shape; a rotor which is coaxial with the stator and is arranged in the radial direction via a predetermined gap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

using mass-produced general-purpose devices like MOSFETs and parasitic diodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParasitic capacitance and diode conduction: Parasitic Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS9166504B2Control apparatus for motor-generator
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 DENSO CORP
  • US9166504B2 patent drawing
  • US9166504B2 patent drawing
  • US9166504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control apparatus for a motor-generator includes a stator including multi-phase coils, a rotor, a multi-phase inverter one arm of which includes a switch element and a free-wheeling element, and a power supply connected between a neutral point of the coils and a negative electrode of the inverter. When the switch elements are driven by rectangular wave, the low-side switch element connected to the high-side switch element is subject to PWM switching control while the high-side switch element is off. When a time point, at which the high-side switch element is turned off, is defined as a base point, if α is defined as a time when switching of the low-side switch element starts, and β is defined as a time when the switching ends, β-α is 120 degrees in electrical degree or more, α is more than 0 degrees, and β is less than 180 degrees.