Motor Inertia Estimation via Position Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor control systems require time-consuming commissioning processes to determine system inertia, which can be inaccurate if inertia changes during operation, leading to suboptimal drive control and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A method using position feedback and derivable motor torque signals to continually estimate system inertia and load torque during normal operation, eliminating the need for separate commissioning procedures and ensuring accurate, real-time adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a commissioning process is performed to determine system inertia, then the drive control can be properly tuned, but the setup time increases and requires skilled personnel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinertia estimation accuracyVSAvoidcommissioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The motor control system automatically performs inertia estimation and load torque disturbance identification during normal operation using readily available position and torque signals. The microprocessor continuously calculates system inertia without requiring external commissioning equipment or skilled personnel intervention, making the system self-configuring and eliminating setup time while maintaining accurate inertia values for optimal control performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously updates the inertia estimate during normal motor operation rather than performing a one-time commissioning measurement. By continuously processing position feedback and torque signals, the system maintains an accurate inertia value that adapts to any changes in the mechanical system, ensuring optimal control performance throughout the entire operational lifecycle without additional setup time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Ease of operation

If a constant inertia value is assumed after commissioning, then the control setup is simplified, but the control performance deteriorates when inertia changes during operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol setup simplicityVSAvoidcontrol performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from using a static, constant inertia value to a dynamic, continuously updating inertia estimate. The microprocessor continuously calculates system inertia during normal operation, allowing the control system to adapt to changing mechanical conditions such as varying loads or friction changes, thereby maintaining optimal control performance without complicating the setup process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring the relationship between motor torque and actual acceleration during operation. By comparing the applied torque with the measured acceleration and position feedback, the system continuously refines the inertia estimate, ensuring that the control parameters remain accurate even as the mechanical system conditions change over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the commissioning procedure is rerun routinely to maintain accurate inertia estimate, then the control performance is maintained, but the maintenance time and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinertia estimation accuracyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs inertia estimation continuously during normal motor operation rather than requiring periodic shutdowns for recalibration. By utilizing the position feedback and torque signals already available during normal operation, the system maintains accurate inertia values without interrupting production or reducing operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The motor control system automatically performs continuous inertia monitoring and self-adjustment during normal operation without requiring external intervention or maintenance activities. The microprocessor continuously processes available sensor data to maintain an accurate inertia estimate, eliminating the need for scheduled maintenance停机 and preserving full operational productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7627440B2Inertia and load torque estimating method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2009.12.01 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US7627440B2 patent drawing
  • US7627440B2 patent drawing
  • US7627440B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for estimating a system inertia and a load torque in a motor controller, the method comprising the steps of providing an acceleration command signal, determining a motor position, using the motor position to generate an acceleration feedback signal, mathematically combining the acceleration feedback signal and a load torque signal to generate a system inertia estimate, mathematically combining the system inertia estimate and the acceleration command signal to generate a motor torque signal, mathematically combining the system inertia estimate and the acceleration feedback signal to generate an inertia torque and mathematically combining the inertia torque and the motor torque signal to generate the load torque estimate.