Motor Vehicle Lock Crash Element Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor vehicle locks do not adequately ensure that the crash element remains locked during crash accelerations without a reaction time delay, potentially allowing the pawl to lift out undesirably.

Innovation Solution

The crash element is kept in a locked position during normal operation and moved to an actuated position only when the pawl is lifted, utilizing an electric crash element drive and a controller that evaluates crash sensor data to prevent unintended activation, ensuring the pawl cannot be lifted during crashes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the crash element is made adjustable to block pawl actuation during crashes, then crash safety is improved, but a reaction time delay occurs between crash acceleration and pawl actuation blocking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash safetyVSAvoidreaction time delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The crash element is pre-positioned in a crash-ready state during normal operation, already configured to block pawl actuation immediately upon crash detection. This preliminary positioning eliminates the need for adjustment during the crash event itself, removing the reaction time delay while maintaining crash safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The crash element's position is dynamically changed based on operational context: during normal operation it is positioned to allow free pawl actuation, but upon crash detection it is rapidly repositioned to block pawl actuation. This dynamic repositioning ensures both normal functionality and crash safety without delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the crash element is constantly locked to prevent pawl lifting during crashes, then crash safety is improved, but the ability to open the door during normal operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash safetyVSAvoiddoor opening capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The crash element transitions between two states: during normal operation it is positioned to allow free pawl actuation and door opening, but upon crash detection it is rapidly repositioned to block pawl actuation. This dynamic switching ensures both normal ease of operation and crash safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares the crash element in advance to block pawl actuation only when needed (upon crash detection), rather than maintaining a constant locked state. This preliminary anti-action prevents the harmful effect (pawl lifting during crashes) only when necessary, preserving normal door opening capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Adaptability or versatility

If an electric crash element drive is added to adjust the crash element position, then flexibility and control are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash element positioning flexibilityVSAvoidlock mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical adjustment mechanism for the crash element is replaced with an electric drive system. This substitution provides more flexible and precise control of the crash element position while reducing mechanical complexity through the use of electric motors and electronic control instead of complex mechanical linkages and adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design ensures the crash element is already locked during crashes, preventing the pawl from being lifted without any reaction time delay, and automatically returns to the locked position after use, enhancing crash safety and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a crash element drive, in particular an electric one, is provided for this purpose, by means of which the crash element can be moved into the actuating position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a controller is provided with which, in one variant, the evaluation of a crash sensor is included in the activation of the crash element drive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrash sensor detection: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentEP2690238B1Motor vehicle lock
Publication Date: 2018.12.12 BROSE SCHLIESSSYSTEME GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2690238B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2690238B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c

AI summary

The lock has locking elements like lock latch (1) and lock pawl (2), in which the lock pawl is disabled in a user-side lock pawl operation, in normal operation. An adjustable crash element allows the pawl to operate freely in the actuating position. The crash element stands in normal operation outside the pawl for actuating predominantly or continuously, in the blocking position and is adjusted in the course of lock pawl operation, before digging the lock pawl from the locked position into the actuating position. An independent claim is included for a method for operating motor vehicle lock.