Synchronous Motor Magnet Protection via Double-T Web

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Synchronous motor magnets are vulnerable to corrosion and mechanical damage, especially in environments with ferromagnetic particles, which can block the air gap and cause mechanical stress, existing protective solutions being either costly or requiring complex assembly.

Innovation Solution

A protective device with a double-T structure, featuring a web with flanges and spring elements, is inserted between magnets to stabilize and protect them from lateral forces and dirt, providing a versatile solution for various motor configurations, including linear and rotary motors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If magnets are left exposed without protective devices, then the structure remains simple and cost-effective, but the magnets are vulnerable to corrosion and mechanical damage from ferromagnetic particles and lateral forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of magnetsVSAvoidprotective structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective device is divided into multiple functional segments: a web portion for insertion between magnets, flange portions for lateral protection, and spring elements for force application. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific protective function while maintaining overall simplicity of the device design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective device acts as an intermediary element inserted between adjacent magnets. It mediates the interaction between magnets by providing lateral support through flanges and applying stabilizing forces through spring elements, thereby protecting magnets from external mechanical influences without requiring complex external protective structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If complex protective structures are used to fully protect magnets, then magnet protection is improved, but installation and maintenance become difficult and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of magnetsVSAvoidinstallation and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The protective device incorporates spring elements that provide dynamic, adaptable support to the magnets. These springs automatically adjust to lateral forces and maintain optimal protective pressure without requiring precise pre-adjustment, simplifying installation while ensuring reliable protection under varying operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring elements provide self-adjusting protective force to the magnets, automatically compensating for variations in magnet positioning and operational lateral forces. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for complex adjustment mechanisms or specialized installation procedures, making the protective device easy to install and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If specialized protective components are designed for specific gap sizes and curvatures, then protection precision is improved, but the number of specially manufactured components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit to magnet gapVSAvoidrange of motor configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The protective device is designed as a universal component that can be applied to various magnet configurations. The web portion adapts to different gap sizes through elastic deformation, while the flange portions provide consistent lateral protection. This multi-functional design allows a single component type to serve multiple protective functions across different motor configurations, eliminating the need for specialized components for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The protective device utilizes parameter changes in its material properties, specifically the elasticity of the web and spring elements. This allows the rigid flange portions to maintain precise protective positioning while the elastic web adapts to varying gap distances and curvatures. The combination of rigid and elastic parameters enables precise protection across diverse motor configurations without requiring specially manufactured components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9768659B2Secondary part of a synchronous motor having a protective device for magnets
Publication Date: 2017.09.19 ETEL SA
  • US9768659B2 patent drawing
  • US9768659B2 patent drawing
  • US9768659B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secondary part of a synchronous motor has a protective device for magnets. The secondary part has a plurality of magnets evenly spaced on a magnet support. The protective device has a web for insertion into the gap between adjacent magnets. The web has a first and second flange at its two ends, so that the web and the flanges form a double-T structure, and the flanges rest against outer edges of the adjacent magnets.