Motor Rotor Position Control With Adaptive Torque Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for controlling the position of a rotor in motors, especially when subjected to external forces like gravity, result in oscillations due to motor inertia, making it difficult to maintain the rotor at or near the zero reference position.

Innovation Solution

A novel angle-to-torque function is implemented in a motor controller, which produces an error value indicating the difference between the current and reference rotor positions. Based on this error, the controller selects an appropriate angle-to-torque converter function to derive a torque value that reduces the positional difference, thereby minimizing oscillations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional angle-to-torque control function is applied to counteract external forces on the rotor, then the rotor position can be maintained against gravity, but oscillations occur due to motor inertia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position maintenanceVSAvoidrotor position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically selects from multiple angle-to-torque converter functions based on the current error magnitude. When error is large, a stiffer spring constant provides strong restoring force; when error is small, a softer spring constant prevents oscillations. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between maintaining position against external forces and preventing oscillations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter (spring constant) of the angle-to-torque converter function based on operating conditions. By selecting different functions with different spring constants according to error magnitude, the system optimizes both position maintenance and oscillation suppression, resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a stiff spring constant is used in the angle-to-torque function to strongly counteract external forces, then rotor position maintenance improves, but oscillations increase due to motor inertia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position maintenanceVSAvoidrotor oscillations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static spring constant to a dynamic selection mechanism that adapts the spring constant based on error magnitude. This resolves the contradiction by applying stiff control only when necessary (large errors) and soft control when approaching the target (small errors), eliminating oscillations while maintaining position accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control function is segmented into multiple discrete angle-to-torque converter functions, each with different spring constants. This segmentation allows the system to choose the appropriate level of stiffness for each operating condition, preventing the oscillations that would result from uniformly stiff control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If multiple angle-to-torque converter functions are implemented to reduce oscillations, then rotor position accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position accuracyVSAvoidcontrol function complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple discrete angle-to-torque converter functions that can be selectively applied. This segmentation achieves high position accuracy through adaptive control while keeping each individual function simple, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the error magnitude to select the appropriate converter function. This feedback mechanism enables accurate rotor position control through adaptive function selection while maintaining relatively simple control logic, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250192704A1Position detection and monitoring
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG
  • US20250192704A1 patent drawing
  • US20250192704A1 patent drawing
  • US20250192704A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes a controller that controls a motor including multiple motor windings. During operation, the motor controller receives an error value indicating a difference between a current angular position of a rotor in the motor with respect to a reference angular position of the rotor. Based on the error value, the controller selects a first angle-to-torque converter function amongst multiple angle-to-torque converter functions in a piecewise angle-to-torque converter function. Via the first angle-to-torque converter function, the controller derives a torque value indicating a magnitude of torque to apply to the rotor. The controller applies the torque as indicated by the torque value to the rotor.