Motor Speed Estimation Using Voting Logic for Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for monitoring motor speeds, particularly in low-speed applications, face challenges in accurately deriving useful voltage/current measurements, leading to inefficiencies in safety monitoring.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a voting-based speed analysis unit and safety logic that evaluates motor speed by analyzing three-phase power, using voting logic to generate a combined estimate and determine its validity, ensuring reliable speed monitoring even in low-speed scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If voltage or current monitoring schemes are used for speed estimation, then safety monitoring can be implemented, but measurement precision deteriorates in low-speed applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidvoltage/current measurements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (voting logic) that processes multiple speed estimates derived from voltage and current measurements. This voting logic compares estimates from different measurement sources and selects the most reliable one, thereby maintaining measurement precision in low-speed applications where direct voltage/current measurements are difficult.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple copies of speed estimation by deriving speed from different combinations of voltage and current measurements across three phases. By generating multiple independent estimates and comparing them through voting logic, the system overcomes the limitation of insufficient measurements in low-speed conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If multiple voltage/current measurements are taken to improve speed estimation accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed estimation accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is designed to perform multiple functions using the same hardware resources. The voting logic unit can process speed estimates from any combination of the three phases, making the system universally applicable across different operating conditions without requiring additional dedicated hardware for each measurement scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the speed estimation task into segments by calculating speed estimates from different phase combinations separately. Each phase pair (UV, VW, WU) independently provides a speed estimate, and the voting logic combines these segmented estimates. This segmentation allows the system to maintain precision while managing complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3828648B1Motor speed estimation for drive safety system
Publication Date: 2023.02.15 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP3828648B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2A
  • EP3828648B1 patent drawingFigure 2B
  • EP3828648B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

According to an aspect, there is provided a method for evaluating safety of a speed of a motor controlled by a frequency converter. The method comprises, first, measuring first, second and third phase currents of three-phase electric power fed from the frequency converter to the motor and forming first, second and third current measurement pairs based thereon. Then, the speed of the motor is estimated separately based on each measurement pair to produce respective first, second and third estimates for the speed of the motor. A voting logic is applied to the first, second and third estimates. An output of the voting logic is fed to a safety logic controlling at least one safety function of the frequency converter. The output of the voting logic comprises an estimate for the speed of the motor and an indication whether or not said final estimate is valid according to the voting logic.