Vehicle Motor Torque Control for Brake Failure Securing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle systems fail to optimally secure a vehicle at a stop when there is a loss of friction braking, particularly on hills or grades, where the vehicle may roll or not be properly held.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing a processor to determine a loss in friction braking and provide propulsion torque from the vehicle's motor to secure the vehicle, including determining if the vehicle is stopped, communicating with the braking system, and shifting the park system to a park gear as necessary, with the ability to override automated controls and adjust torque based on rolling direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If friction brakes are used to secure the vehicle at a stop, then the vehicle can be held stationary, but the securing function fails when friction brake communication is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle securing reliabilityVSAvoidbraking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor serves as an intermediary component to provide backup securing function when the primary friction brake system fails. The motor provides propulsion torque to compensate for lost brake function, acting as a mediator between the control system and the vehicle's motion control needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the motor from its normal propulsion function to a securing function by applying controlled propulsion torque in reverse or holding mode. This parameter change allows the motor to perform the securing function temporarily until the vehicle can be parked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the motor provides propulsion torque to secure the vehicle, then the vehicle remains stationary on slopes, but energy is consumed continuously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle securing reliabilityVSAvoidmotor energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motor torque application is dynamic rather than static - the motor provides torque only when needed (when brake failure is detected and vehicle speed is zero) and stops when the vehicle is secured in park gear. This dynamic operation reduces energy consumption compared to continuous torque application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of brake system communication status and proactively engages the motor to provide securing torque before the vehicle can roll. This preliminary action prevents the need for higher corrective torque later, reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If automated control actions are implemented for vehicle securing, then response time is reduced, but driver override capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol response speedVSAvoiddriver control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback by continuously monitoring vehicle speed, park gear status, and driver inputs. When the driver attempts to accelerate or the vehicle speed becomes non-zero, the system receives feedback and automatically disengages the securing torque, providing both automated response and driver flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated securing system serves itself by automatically detecting brake failure, engaging motor torque, monitoring vehicle status, and disengaging when park gear is engaged - all without requiring driver intervention. The system only requires driver input when override conditions are met, balancing automation with control flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11618450B1Remedial action for securing vehicle during loss of friction brakes at stop
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11618450B1 patent drawing
  • US11618450B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are for securing a vehicle. In an exemplary embodiment, the vehicle includes a body, a drive system, a braking system, and a processor. The drive system is configured to generate movement of the body, and includes a motor. The braking system includes friction brakes that provide friction braking. The processor is disposed onboard the vehicle, coupled to the motor, and is configured to at least facilitate: determining that a loss in friction braking has occurred while the vehicle is being stopped; and providing instructions to the motor for providing propulsion torque, thereby securing the vehicle at a stop, when it is determined that the loss in friction braking has occurred; wherein the motor is further configured to execute the instructions provided by the processor for providing the propulsion torque.