Electric Motor Torque Control for Fast Hydraulic Pump Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydraulic systems in construction machines suffer from slow response times and latency issues due to slow communication interfaces and PLC processing delays, which affect machine handling accuracy and can lead to undesired over-steering.

Innovation Solution

A control unit that directly converts load pressure into target drive torque for an electric drive motor, bypassing slow feedback loops, allowing for faster and more energy-efficient control of hydraulic systems by using a look-up table or analytical relationships to map load pressure to torque, and incorporating feedback for calibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If control messaging via CAN bus and PLC processing is used, then system reliability is maintained, but control response time increases and bandwidth is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol response timeVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the critical control function from the slow PLC/CAN bus system and implements it directly in the motor controller's microprocessor. This allows the torque control to bypass the slow communication interface and respond immediately to load pressure changes, achieving millisecond-level response times while maintaining system reliability through the distributed control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is segmented into two parts: time-critical torque control handled by the motor controller's microprocessor, and higher-level system management handled by the PLC. This segmentation allows fast local responses without compromising overall system coordination and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If feedback loops are used for motor control, then system stability is improved, but control bandwidth is reduced and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol bandwidthVSAvoidcontrol latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates the relationship between load pressure and required torque using a lookup table stored in the motor controller's memory. When load pressure changes, the controller immediately retrieves the corresponding torque value from the pre-computed table, eliminating the need for real-time iterative calculations and reducing control latency while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical-hydraulic feedback loop with an electronic control system that directly measures load pressure and converts it to torque commands. This substitution eliminates mechanical delays and enables faster electronic response, achieving high control bandwidth without the latency inherent in mechanical feedback systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If direct torque control is implemented, then responsiveness to load changes is improved, but energy efficiency may be compromised without proper pressure margin management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem responsivenessVSAvoidmotor energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors actual pump output pressure and compares it with the target pressure derived from load pressure plus margin. This feedback loop allows the controller to adjust motor torque in real-time, ensuring the motor only consumes the energy necessary to maintain the required pressure margin, thereby achieving both responsiveness and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the pressure margin based on operating conditions. During transient load changes, a larger margin ensures rapid response, while during steady-state operation, the margin is reduced to minimize energy consumption. This dynamic adjustment optimizes the trade-off between responsiveness and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12467234B2Electrical motor control for high performance hydraulic systems
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 HUSQVARNA AB
  • US12467234B2 patent drawing
  • US12467234B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control unit (150) for controlling a hydraulic system on a construction machine (100), where the hydraulic system comprises a hydraulic pump arrangement with an electric drive motor configured to drive a hydraulic pump at a controllable drive torque, wherein the control unit (150) is arranged to obtain a load pressure of at least one actuator in the hydraulic system, to convert the obtained load pressure into a corresponding torque, and to control the electric drive motor to generate the torque.