Electric Motor Torque Vectoring for Understeer Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional torque vectoring control methods in vehicles result in power loss and limitations in control response speed, precision, and linearity due to mechanical systems, making it difficult to effectively manage handling characteristics, especially in rear-wheel drive and front-wheel drive vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A control method that uses a controller to determine the vehicle's understeer or oversteer state and adjusts motor torque between the front and rear wheels based on the driver's acceleration willingness, allowing for precise control of motor torque distribution without power loss, utilizing characteristics like fast response and linearity of electric motors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional torque vectoring control uses brake operation to control understeer or oversteer characteristics, then handling performance is improved, but power loss occurs and power efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling performanceVSAvoidpower loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional mechanical brake-based torque vectoring system with an electric motor system. Each wheel is equipped with an independent motor that can directly control wheel torque without using brakes, thereby eliminating power loss associated with brake operation while maintaining or improving handling performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the torque control function from the brake system and assigns it to independent motor units at each wheel. This separation allows the brake system to focus solely on stopping functions while motors handle torque vectoring, eliminating the power loss that occurs when brakes are used for torque control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Force

If conventional torque vectoring uses mechanical systems with hydraulic pressure and brake friction, then torque control is achieved, but control response speed, precision, and linearity are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque controlVSAvoidcontrol response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the multi-stage mechanical control system (hydraulic pressure → brake friction → actuation force) with direct electric motor control. This eliminates the mechanical transmission stages that limit response speed, precision, and linearity, allowing for rapid and precise torque adjustment at each wheel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the vehicle's drive system into four independent motor units, one for each wheel. This segmentation allows each wheel to be controlled independently with high precision and fast response, overcoming the limitations of centralized mechanical control systems that must manage all wheels through a single hydraulic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Power

If power from one engine is distributed to front and rear wheels, then power delivery is achieved, but the power of the four wheels cannot be controlled independently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower distributionVSAvoidindependent wheel power control
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the power delivery system into four independent motor units, one for each wheel. This allows each wheel to receive and control its own power independently, enabling precise torque vectoring and adaptive power distribution that cannot be achieved with a single engine distributing power through a mechanical transmission system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical power distribution system (single engine → transmission → differential → wheels) with an electric power distribution system where each wheel has its own motor. This substitution enables independent control of each wheel's power output, providing superior adaptability for various driving conditions and handling scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11529877B2Control method of vehicle handling
Publication Date: 2022.12.20 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11529877B2 patent drawing
  • US11529877B2 patent drawing
  • US11529877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control method of vehicle handling includes determining that a driving state of a vehicle is an understeer state from an electronic stability control, determining a position of an accelerator from an accelerator position sensor in response to determining that the driving state of the vehicle is the understeer state, and controlling a motor torque of a front wheel side of the vehicle to be smaller than a motor torque of a rear wheel side of the vehicle according to the position of the accelerator.