Motor Trajectory Estimation With Dynamic Constraint Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional control strategies for precision motion systems face challenges in balancing precision with computational efficiency, leading to either excessive computational intensity or conservative safety margins that reduce productivity and speed.

Innovation Solution

A motion control system that generates dynamically feasible trajectories by using a hybrid approach, incorporating a motion planner, tracking controller, and amplifier, which considers motor dynamics and constraints to optimize torque, velocity, acceleration, and voltage, and employs a dynamic parameter estimator to adaptively adjust motor parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If optimization-based control strategies are used to generate optimal motion trajectories, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to computational intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-computes and stores optimal trajectories offline using optimization-based methods. During real-time operation, the pre-computed trajectories are retrieved and executed without requiring intensive online computation, thus achieving high precision while reducing real-time computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts trajectory parameters based on real-time motor state feedback. By combining offline optimization with online adaptive adjustment, the system maintains high trajectory accuracy while keeping real-time computational requirements manageable through dynamic parameter tuning rather than full re-optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If parameterized trajectory control strategies are used to reduce computational complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to conservative safety margins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidtrajectory optimality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Optimal trajectory parameters are pre-computed offline and stored in a database. During real-time operation, the system retrieves these pre-optimized parameters and applies them directly, eliminating the need for conservative safety margins while maintaining computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback on motor state (current, voltage, temperature) to dynamically adjust trajectory execution. This feedback mechanism allows the system to safely operate at the boundaries of motor capabilities without requiring conservative margins, thus improving precision while maintaining computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If large safety margins are introduced to ensure dynamic feasibility, then reliability is improved, but productivity decreases due to reduced speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic feasibilityVSAvoidpositioning speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time feedback on motor state (current, voltage, temperature) enables the system to dynamically verify dynamic feasibility during operation. This continuous monitoring allows the system to operate with minimal safety margins while ensuring reliability through immediate detection and correction of feasibility violations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts trajectory parameters based on real-time motor capabilities. By continuously adapting to the actual motor state rather than using fixed conservative margins, the system achieves both high reliability and maximum productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves faster and more accurate motor control by generating trajectories that fully utilize motor capabilities while ensuring dynamic feasibility, reducing conservatism and enhancing productivity.

Implementation Method 1

The amplifier converts the control signal to voltage supplied to motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the motor drives the load with electromagnetic torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic torque: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20260074634A1Systems and methods for controlling a motor with dynamically parameterized trajectory estimation
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
  • US20260074634A1 patent drawing
  • US20260074634A1 patent drawing
  • US20260074634A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for controlling a motor comprises a processor and a memory having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, cause the controller to collect a feedback signal indicative of the current state of an operation of the motor and determine current constraints on parameters of the operation of the motor using model of dynamics of the motor connecting the current state of the motor with the current constraints on the operation. The processor is further configured to determine a control trajectory of the operation of the motor based on the current constraints on parameters of the operation of the motor using a parametrized estimation agnostic to the dynamics of the motor and control the operation of the motor according to the control trajectory.