Motor-Operated Valve Spring Layout for Backlash-Free Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional motor-operated valves experience hysteresis issues due to backlash in the feed screw mechanism, leading to inconsistencies in flow rate control, and existing solutions like bellows are expensive and complicated to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

A motor-operated valve design with a coil spring arranged within the valve chamber to absorb backlash, allowing for precise control and reducing the vertical dimension, eliminating the need for expensive bellows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bellows are used to prevent coolant leakage and absorb backlash, then sealing performance is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the sealing function from the bellows component and implements it separately through a seal ring (O-ring) that prevents coolant leakage between the valve shaft and valve chamber wall. This separates the sealing function from the backlash absorption function, allowing each to be optimized independently and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive bellows with a simple, inexpensive seal ring (O-ring) that provides adequate sealing performance. The seal ring is a standard, readily available component that is much cheaper than custom-manufactured bellows, thereby reducing manufacturing cost while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Manufacturing precision

If bellows are used to absorb backlash, then hysteresis is reduced, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate control precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a spring as an intermediary component between the valve shaft and the seal ring. This spring absorbs the backlash in the feed screw mechanism by providing elastic compression, thereby eliminating hysteresis and improving flow rate control precision without requiring expensive bellows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive bellows with a simple, inexpensive spring that provides equivalent backlash absorption functionality. The spring is a standard mechanical component that is much easier and cheaper to manufacture, thereby reducing manufacturing cost while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Manufacturing precision

If spring is arranged above the valve chamber to absorb backlash, then hysteresis is reduced, but vertical dimension increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate control precisionVSAvoidvertical dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent nests the spring within the valve chamber space, positioning it between the valve shaft and the seal ring. This nested arrangement allows the spring to absorb backlash and reduce hysteresis without increasing the vertical dimension of the overall valve assembly, as it utilizes existing internal space rather than adding external height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent repositions the backlash-absorbing spring from a vertical arrangement (above the valve chamber) to a horizontal arrangement (within the valve chamber, radially outward from the valve shaft). This dimensional change allows the spring to perform its function while minimizing impact on the vertical dimension of the valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents hysteresis and allows for precise flow rate control while minimizing manufacturing costs and vertical dimensions, enhancing the operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the valve.

Implementation Method 1

a coil spring arranged in the valve chamber and acting on the valve shaft in the valve opening direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The valve shaft 124 is always urged downward by a compression coil spring 134 contracted in the valve shaft holder 132

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP1903266B1Motor-operated valve
Publication Date: 2011.11.23 FUJIKOKI CORP
  • EP1903266B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1903266B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1903266B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A motor-operated valve includes a driving unit including a rotor (8) and a stator (2), a feed screw mechanism (1c), and a valve main body unit (10). In order to remove backlash intrinsic in the feed screw mechanism (1c), a coil spring (70) that urges a valve body in a direction away from a valve seat (62) is arranged in a valve chamber. A spring bearing (73) that forms a housing, in which the coil spring is housed, in the valve chamber (12) is provided. Therefore, the large valve chamber is secured in the valve main body unit and passing sound is reduced when a fluid passes the motor-operated valve. Contact surfaces of the valve body and the coil spring can be aligning curved surfaces that absorb a bend of the coil spring.