Vehicle Motor Yaw Control for Oversteer and Understeer Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle motor control systems do not effectively consider handling performance, such as oversteer or understeer, when determining motor control amounts, leading to inadequate turning responsiveness and stability.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle motor control apparatus and method that calculates a motor control amount based on the vehicle's state, using a processor to determine whether the vehicle is in an over-steer or under-steer state, and adjusts the motor control accordingly by calculating a target yaw moment, incorporating factors like tire force, yaw rate, and slip angles to improve torque control for front and rear wheel motors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If motor control amount is determined without considering handling performance, then device complexity is reduced, but turning responsiveness and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidturning stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of turning situations into five categories (sharp turn, moderate turn, straight turn, U-turn, 180-degree turn) based on steering angle and steering angle change rate before executing motor control. This preliminary classification enables appropriate torque control to be applied in advance for each turning phase, improving turning stability without requiring complex real-time calculations during execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts motor torque based on the detected turning situation and phase, transitioning between different control modes (driving control, braking control, or no control) depending on the vehicle state. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize handling performance for each specific turning scenario rather than using a fixed control strategy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If motor control amount is determined without considering handling performance, then calculation complexity is reduced, but turning responsiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation complexityVSAvoidturning responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The turning process is segmented into distinct phases (initial turning phase and subsequent turning phase) based on steering angle change rate thresholds. This segmentation allows the system to apply different control strategies appropriate to each phase, enabling rapid response during initial turning while maintaining stability during subsequent phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different torque control characteristics to front and rear wheel motors based on the specific turning situation and phase. For example, during understeer conditions, the rear motor may receive driving control while the front motor receives braking control, creating localized torque differences that improve overall turning responsiveness without requiring complex global recalculation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Speed

If torque control is performed for each turning situation, then turning responsiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturning responsivenessVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes control parameters (torque magnitude, torque direction, control mode selection) based on detected turning situations and phases. By using predefined thresholds for steering angle and steering angle change rate, the system can switch between different torque control parameters without requiring complex algorithms, thus improving responsiveness while limiting complexity growth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors steering angle, steering angle change rate, and vehicle speed to detect turning situations and phases. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically adjust motor torque in response to actual vehicle behavior, improving turning responsiveness while using simple threshold-based detection logic rather than complex predictive models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11794590B2Apparatus for controlling motor of a vehicle and method thereof
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11794590B2 patent drawing
  • US11794590B2 patent drawing
  • US11794590B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle motor control apparatus includes: a processor configured to determine whether a state of a vehicle is an over-steer state or an under-steer state, to determine a driving control mode or a braking control mode of a motor based on a determination result of the state of the vehicle, to calculate a target yaw moment of based on a tire force by using the over-steer state or the under-steer state, and to determine a motor control amount that follows the target yaw moment; and a storage configured to store data and algorithms driven by the processor.