Off-Road Motorcycle Frame Head Pipe Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle body frame molding techniques for off-road motorcycles face challenges such as restricted design freedom, increased molding costs, stress concentration, and weight due to mold undercuts and complex processing requirements, leading to inefficient production and potential structural weaknesses.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle body frame design featuring a head pipe with upper and lower side pipe parts, reinforcing members, and obliquely split molds for forging, which reduces mold restrictions, decreases processing strokes, and enhances joint strength through extended joint lengths and strategic reinforcement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If right and left split molds are used for forging the head pipe, then a highly rigid and strong product with no internal defect can be obtained, but the design freedom is restricted due to mold undercut constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead pipe strengthVSAvoiddesign freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The head pipe is divided into multiple segments (cylindrical part, vertical wall part, annular wall parts, tongue piece parts) that can be formed by separate molding operations. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently, overcoming the undercut constraints of split molds while maintaining the overall structural integrity and strength through proper joining of segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If annular wall parts are joined to main frames with bumping tips, then joint strength is achieved, but stress concentration occurs due to sudden changes in cross-sectional area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidstress concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The annular wall parts are designed with curved surfaces that gradually transition into the main frames, replacing sharp bumping tips with smooth, rounded transitions. This curvature eliminates sudden changes in cross-sectional area, distributing stress evenly across the joint interface and preventing stress concentration while maintaining joint strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Shape

If front and rear split molds are used to mold tongue piece parts, then the head pipe structure can be formed, but the mold depth increases and processing stroke is lengthened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead pipe structureVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The tongue piece parts are reoriented and formed in a different dimensional configuration that reduces the required mold depth. By changing the orientation and forming approach, the processing stroke is shortened while still achieving the necessary head pipe structure, thereby improving productivity without sacrificing structural requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If complex head pipe structures are molded with split molds, then design freedom is partially achieved, but molding cost increases due to large-scale processing machines and prolonged processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign freedomVSAvoidmolding cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The head pipe is segmented into modular components that can be formed using simpler, smaller molding equipment. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured with less complex and more cost-effective molding processes, reducing the need for large-scale processing machines and prolonged processing times while still achieving the desired design freedom through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Ease of manufacture

If head pipes are subjected to mold undercut restrictions, then molding is simplified, but material waste increases and vehicle body frame weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolding simplicityVSAvoidvehicle body frame weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The head pipe components are designed with curved surfaces and rounded transitions that eliminate the need for complex undercut features in the molds. This curvature approach simplifies the molding process by allowing easier mold release while minimizing material waste, as the smooth transitions require less excess material to accommodate mold constraints, thereby reducing the overall weight of the vehicle body frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS8746389B2Vehicle body frame
Publication Date: 2014.06.10 SUZUKI MOTOR CORP
  • US8746389B2 patent drawing
  • US8746389B2 patent drawing
  • US8746389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A head pipe of a vehicle body frame includes an upper side head pipe with a pair of upper and lower facing piece parts extending from an upper side pipe part so as to fit to upper and lower wall portions of a pair of right and left main frames, a lower side head pipe with a lower side pipe part joined to the upper side pipe part and a front side tongue piece part extending from the lower side pipe part so as to fit to a front wall portion of a down frame, and a reinforcing member joined to a rear portion of the upper side head pipe and having a rear side tongue piece part extending so as to fit to a rear wall portion of the down frame from a vertical wall part positioned between inner side wall portions of the main frames.