Motorcycle Warning Control Using Helmet Posture Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Riders of straddle-type vehicles, such as motorcycles, face safety and comfort issues due to frequent unnecessary warnings from existing warning systems, as their body is exposed and prone to hazards, leading to discomfort when warnings are not contextually relevant.

Innovation Solution

A processor and method that integrates a surrounding environment detector, helmet posture direction detector, and alarm system to determine the necessity of warnings based on both environmental and rider posture information, ensuring warnings are only given when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If warning operation is performed in all situations where hazards are detected, then rider safety is improved, but rider comfort deteriorates due to unnecessary warnings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverider safetyVSAvoidrider comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors helmet posture direction and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust warning issuance. By comparing real-time posture data with hazard conditions, the system determines whether warnings are necessary, creating a closed-loop control that balances safety and comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of warning issuance from a fixed state (always warn when hazard detected) to a dynamic state conditioned on helmet posture angle and duration. This parameter change allows the system to adapt warning behavior based on rider attention state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If warning operation is restricted to reduce unnecessary alerts, then rider comfort is improved, but rider safety may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverider comfortVSAvoidrider safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of rider attention state through helmet posture detection before deciding whether to issue warnings. This preliminary action ensures that safety-critical warnings are not missed while filtering out unnecessary ones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Helmet posture direction information serves as an intermediary parameter that mediates between hazard detection and warning issuance. This intermediary allows the system to intelligently filter warnings based on rider state without directly compromising safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If helmet posture direction detection is added to determine warning necessity, then rider comfort is improved by reducing unnecessary warnings, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverider comfortVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet posture direction detector serves multiple functions: it monitors rider attention state, determines warning necessity, and potentially tracks rider behavior patterns. This multi-functionality justifies the added device complexity by providing multiple benefits from a single sensor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3892510B1Processing device and processing method for straddle-type vehicle warning system, straddle-type vehicle warning system, and straddle-type vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.01.07 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3892510B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3892510B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3892510B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention obtains a processor, a processing method, a warning system, and a straddle-type vehicle capable of improving both the rider's safety and the rider's comfort. A processor (20) includes: an acquisition section that acquires surrounding environment information corresponding to output of a surrounding environment detector (11) during travel of a straddle-type vehicle (100); a determination section that determines necessity of warning operation provided to the rider and generated by the warning system (1) ; and a control section that makes an alarm (30) perform the warning operation in the case where the determination section determines that the warning operation is necessary. The acquisition section further acquires helmet posture direction information corresponding to output of a helmet posture direction detector (13) during the travel of the straddle-type vehicle (100). The determination section determines the necessity of the warning operation on the basis of the surrounding environment information and the helmet posture direction information.