Motorized extendable table

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing extendable table technologies are inefficient and costly in terms of operation and maintenance, lacking a simple and economical solution for remote control operation and volumetric efficiency during extension and retraction.

Innovation Solution

A motorized extendable table design featuring a tabletop assembly, extension assemblies on frame assemblies, a motor housing with a computer assembly and remote control, and a base assembly with ballbearing side slides and double pivoting hinges, allowing for efficient extension and retraction controlled by a motor assembly and remote control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual extension mechanisms are used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in extending and retracting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of extension and retractionVSAvoidcomplexity of extension mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical extension mechanisms with an electric motor assembly that automatically extends and retracts the tabletop. The motor assembly includes a motor, drive shaft, and transmission mechanism that converts rotational motion into linear motion for extending the tabletop sections, eliminating the need for manual cranks or levers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The extension mechanism is designed to operate autonomously through the motor assembly, which self-regulates the extension and retraction process. The system includes sensors and control circuitry that detect the extended position and automatically stop the motor, eliminating the need for continuous manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If remote control operation is added, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote control operationVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote control device as an intermediary between the user and the motor assembly. The remote control contains a transmitter that sends wireless signals to a receiver connected to the motor assembly, allowing the user to operate the extension mechanism from a distance without adding complex wired controls to the table structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical control mechanisms (buttons, switches, or levers on the table) with wireless electronic control through the remote device. This substitution uses radio frequency or infrared communication to transmit control signals, simplifying the physical structure while maintaining full control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Volume of moving object

If extension assemblies are fully integrated, then volumetric efficiency is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates due to assembly complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolumetric efficiency during storageVSAvoidassembly complexity of extension mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the tabletop into separate extendable sections that can be manufactured independently and then assembled. The extension assemblies include discrete components such as individual tabletop sections, hinge mechanisms, and support structures that can be produced separately and connected through standardized joining methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The extension assemblies are designed to nest within each other when retracted, with smaller components fitting inside larger ones. The tabletop sections fold or slide into compact configurations that minimize the overall volume occupied during storage, while the modular design allows for straightforward assembly by simply connecting the nested components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a durable, reliable, and cost-effective motorized extendable table that can be efficiently operated and stored, with remote control functionality, ensuring easy extension and retraction while maintaining a compact form.

Implementation Method 1

A motorized extendable table design featuring a tabletop assembly, extension assemblies on frame assemblies, a motor housing with a computer assembly and remote control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

ballbearing side slides and double pivoting hinges, allowing for efficient extension and retraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBall bearing: Ball Bearing

Implementation Method 3

ballbearing side slides and double pivoting hinges, allowing for efficient extension and retraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHinge mechanism: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS10492598B2Motorized extendable table
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 HADIDA WORLDWIDE CO LLC
  • US10492598B2 patent drawing
  • US10492598B2 patent drawing
  • US10492598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motorized extendable table having a tabletop assembly, first and second extension assemblies, a frame assembly, first and second extension frame assemblies, a motor housing, a computer assembly, a motor assembly, and a base assembly. In operation, the motor assembly moves the extension frame assemblies from a retracted to an extended configuration. Before reaching a fully extended configuration, the extension assemblies are raised to a same plane as that of the tabletop assembly. To go from the extended to the retracted configuration, the motor assembly moves the system in an opposite direction, moving the extension frame assemblies down and back onto a lower plane. Extension frame assemblies continue moving back until the fully retracted configuration is reached.