Motorized Foot Retaining Device for Inversion Exerciser

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tilting inversion exercisers lack a secure ankle or foot retaining mechanism that can be easily operated by users, especially when the device is rotated, and do not have a safety device to prevent inadvertent disengagement of the ankle or foot holder during use.

Innovation Solution

A power rotating ankle holder or foot retaining device with a motorized mechanism to securely clamp and detach the user's ankles or feet, combined with a safety device that switches off the retaining mechanism to prevent inadvertent operation when the exerciser is rotated.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a manually operated locking device is used to retain the user's feet, then the device structure can be simple, but it becomes difficult for users to operate when lying on the table during inversion exercises

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEase of operationVSAvoidDevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical locking device is replaced with an electric motor-driven system. The motor automatically moves the foot anchor members to clamp the user's feet, eliminating the need for manual operation while the user is in an inverted position. This substitution resolves the contradiction by providing ease of operation through automation while managing complexity through integrated control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The foot retaining device is designed to automatically adjust and clamp the user's feet without requiring manual intervention. The motorized system self-adjusts the position of the foot anchor members, allowing the device to serve itself in securing the user during inversion exercises, thereby improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If the ankle holder is designed to be easily operated, then user convenience is improved, but the risk of inadvertent operation or disengagement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEase of operationVSAvoidReliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a control mechanism that monitors the operational state of the foot retaining device. The control means receives signals from sensors that detect whether the device is in a safe state, and automatically activates or deactivates the motor accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that the device cannot be inadvertently operated or disengaged, maintaining reliability while keeping the interface simple for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A control mechanism acts as an intermediary between the user and the motorized foot retaining system. This intermediary layer includes control means and sensing means that mediate the operation, ensuring that activation only occurs under appropriate conditions. This prevents direct inadvertent operation while maintaining ease of use through simple control interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a power-driven mechanism is used to retain the user's feet, then secure retention is achieved, but the device complexity and power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveReliabilityVSAvoidDevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex manual mechanical locking system is replaced with a more compact motor-driven mechanism. The electric motor provides reliable clamping force through a simplified transmission system that moves the foot anchor members along the stem. This substitution achieves secure retention while reducing overall mechanical complexity compared to traditional manual locking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor-driven mechanism serves multiple functions: it clamps the foot anchor members to retain the user's feet, positions them accurately along the stem, and can be controlled through a simple interface. This multi-functionality consolidates several mechanical components into a single integrated system, achieving reliable retention without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures secure retention of the user's ankles or feet during exercises and prevents inadvertent disengagement, enhancing user safety and ease of operation by using a motorized mechanism that automatically switches off when the device is rotated.

Implementation Method 1

a motor (37) for rotating and driving the threaded shank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a threaded shank (38) rotatably disposed in the tube (34), and a threaded member (41) secured in the stem (35) and threaded with the threaded shank (38)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS7544157B2Power driven tilting inversion exerciser
Publication Date: 2009.06.09 TEETER ROGER C
  • US7544157B2 patent drawing
  • US7544157B2 patent drawing
  • US7544157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tilting inversion exerciser includes a table rotatably supported on a supporting stand, a foot retaining device for being powered and actuated to clamp and to retain ankle portions of the user to the table without being operated manually by the user. A motorized coupling device may move and adjust the table relative to the stand. A safety device may be used for switching off the foot retaining device to prevent the ankle portions of the user from being disengaged from the foot retaining device inadvertently when the table is operated by the user, particularly when the table and the user are rotated to a vertical position relative to the supporting stand and the ground.