Motorized Footwear Lacing With Multi-Stage Gesture Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional motorized lacing systems in footwear lack sensitivity to wearer gestures, failing to detect and respond to deliberate commands for adjusting lace tension, as they do not utilize activity sensors that can differentiate between motion and intended gestures.

Innovation Solution

A sensor system integrated into the footwear that detects foot activity and gestures, such as heel clicks or toe taps, to enable gesture-based control of the lacing mechanism, using multiple stages to differentiate between enabling and command gestures, thereby accurately interpreting user inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional motorized lacing systems are used, then lacing automation is achieved, but gesture detection capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelacing automationVSAvoidgesture detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the motorized lacing system with an activity sensor system into a single integrated footwear device. The sensor system includes sensors that detect foot movements and gestures, which are then processed by a controller to automatically adjust lace tension. This merging allows the system to provide both automated lacing and gesture detection capabilities simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The activity sensor system serves multiple functions: it detects gestures for lacing control, monitors foot movement, and provides data for various performance metrics. The same sensor system that enables gesture recognition also supports other footwear functions, making the device multi-functional and adaptable to different user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If activity sensors are added to detect gestures, then gesture control is enabled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture controlVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is divided into multiple independent sensors positioned at different locations within the footwear (e.g., heel, toe, midfoot). Each sensor detects specific types of movements or gestures independently. The controller then processes signals from these segmented sensors to determine user intent, reducing the complexity of any single sensor while maintaining overall system capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A controller or processing unit acts as an intermediary between the multiple sensors and the motorized lacing system. This intermediary component consolidates the complex task of interpreting multiple sensor signals into a unified gesture recognition algorithm, simplifying the overall system architecture by centralizing the decision-making logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple stages are used to differentiate gestures, then gesture recognition accuracy is improved, but response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture recognition accuracyVSAvoidgesture response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enters a low-power listening mode where sensors continuously monitor for gesture initiation. When a potential gesture is detected, the system pre-activates the gesture recognition algorithm and prepares the motorized lacing system for immediate response. This preliminary action reduces the effective response time by having components ready before a full gesture sequence is completed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The gesture recognition system uses periodic sampling of sensor data at optimized intervals. Instead of continuously processing all sensor signals at high frequency, the system samples at periodic intervals that are sufficient to detect gesture patterns while minimizing processing time. This periodic action maintains accuracy by capturing essential gesture information without the computational overhead of continuous high-frequency processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3429387B1Footwear with motorized lacing and gesture control
Publication Date: 2024.01.31 NIKE INNOVATE CV
  • EP3429387B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3429387B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3429387B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An article of footwear includes a motorized tensioning system, sensors, and a gesture control system. Based on information received from one or more sensors the gesture control system may detect a prompting gesture and enters an enabled mode for receiving further instructions. In the enabled mode the system may detect a variety of different control gestures that correspond to different tensioning commands.